COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SINGLE-PILL AND SEPARATE-PILL ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TRIPLE-COMBINATION THERAPY: A POPULATION-BASED MICROSIMULATION STUDY

Gabriella Morabito,Federico Rea,Caterina Gregorio,Francesca Ieva,Giulia Barbati,Giovanni Corrao,Giuseppe Mancia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001022184.68536.59
IF: 4.9
2024-05-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness profile of the perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide single-pill combination (SPC) compared with the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium-channel blocker, and a diuretic as a SPC of two drugs plus the third drug separately from the Italian payer perspective. Design and method: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted employing multi-state semi-Markov modeling and microsimulation. Using the healthcare utilization database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), 30,172 and 65,817 patients aged >=40 years who initiated SPC and two-pill combination, respectively, between 2015 and 2018 were identified. The observation period extended from the date of the first drug prescription until death, emigration, or December 31, 2019. Disease and cost models were parametrized using the study cohort, and a lifetime microsimulation was applied to project costs and life expectancy for the compared strategies Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 1,000 samples was performed to address parameter uncertainty. Results: Compared with the two-pill combination, the SPC increased life expectancy by 0.86 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–1.14), with a reduction in total cost of –€12 (95% CI –9,719 to 8,131), making it the dominant strategy (ICER of –14, 95% CI –€15,871 to €7,113). The cost reduction associated with the SPC was primarily driven by savings in hospitalization costs, amounting to €1,850 (95% CI 17 to 7,813) and €2,027 (95% CI 19 to 8,603) for patients treated with the SPC and two-pill combination, respectively. Conversely, drug costs were higher for the SPC (€3,848, 95% CI 574 to 10,640 vs. €3,710, 95% CI 263 to 11,955). This was the case for all strata of age, sex, and clinical status. Conclusions: The SPC was projected to increase survival and reduce costs compared with the two-pill combination. This is likely explained by an improvement in drug compliance. As three-drug SPC is currently prescribed to only a few patients, the widespread use of this strategy could result in benefits for both patients and the healthcare system.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?