Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Bone Repair of Human Hip Osteonecrosis with Bilateral Match-Control Evaluation: Impact of Tissue Source, Cell Count, Disease Stage, and Volume Size on 908 Hips

Philippe Hernigou,Yasuhiro Homma,Jacques Hernigou,Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette,Helène Rouard,Sophie Verrier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13090776
IF: 6
2024-05-02
Cells
Abstract:We investigated the impact of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy on treating bilateral human hip osteonecrosis, analyzing 908 cases. This study assesses factors such as tissue source and cell count, comparing core decompression with various cell therapies. This research emphasizes bone repair according to pre-treatment conditions and the specificities of cell therapy in osteonecrosis repair, indicating a potential for improved bone repair strategies in hips without femoral head collapse. This study utilized a single-center retrospective analysis to investigate the efficacy of cellular approaches in the bone repair of osteonecrosis. It examined the impact on bone repair of tissue source (autologous bone marrow concentrate, allogeneic expanded, autologous expanded), cell quantity (from none in core decompression alone to millions in cell therapy), and osteonecrosis stage and volume. Excluding hips with femoral head collapse, it focused on patients who had bilateral hip osteonecrosis, both pre-operative and post-operative MRIs, and a follow-up of over five years. The analysis divided these patients into seven groups based on match control treatment variations in bilateral hip osteonecrosis, primarily investigating the outcomes between core decompression, washing effect, and different tissue sources of MSCs. Younger patients (<30 years) demonstrated significantly better repair volumes, particularly in stage II lesions, than older counterparts. Additionally, bone repair volume increased with the number of implanted MSCs up to 1,000,000, beyond which no additional benefits were observed. No significant difference was observed in repair outcomes between different sources of MSCs (BMAC, allogenic, or expanded cells). The study also highlighted that a 'washing effect' was beneficial, particularly for larger-volume osteonecrosis when combined with core decompression. Partial bone repair was the more frequent event observed, while total bone repair of osteonecrosis was rare. The volume and stage of osteonecrosis, alongside the number of injected cells, significantly affected treatment outcomes. In summary, this study provides comprehensive insights into the effectiveness and variables influencing the use of mesenchymal stem cells in treating human hip osteonecrosis. It emphasizes the potential of cell therapy while acknowledging the complexity and variability of results based on factors such as age, cell count, and disease stage.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy in treating human hip osteonecrosis and analyze the impact of various factors on bone repair. Specifically, the study focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Tissue Source**: The study compares the effects of autologous bone marrow concentrate (BMAC), allogeneic expanded cells, and autologous expanded cells. 2. **Cell Quantity**: The study examines the impact of different cell quantities on bone repair, ranging from acellular (simple decompression) to millions of cells. 3. **Disease Stage**: The study focuses on different stages (stage I and stage II) of hip osteonecrosis. 4. **Injection Volume**: The study analyzes the impact of different liquid injection volumes (e.g., 20cc) on repair efficacy. 5. **Flushing Effect**: The study also explores the flushing effect of liquid injection (e.g., 20cc) when combined with core decompression. The study evaluates how these factors influence bone repair in hip osteonecrosis through a retrospective analysis of single-center data. The study specifically excludes cases of femoral head collapse, focusing on patients with complete preoperative and postoperative MRIs and follow-up exceeding 5 years. By comparing the effects of different treatment methods, the study attempts to identify which factors can significantly improve the repair outcomes of early-stage hip osteonecrosis.