Abstract:Background: Understanding the complex relationships among multiple strategies for gathering users' perspectives in the evaluation of the performance of services is crucial for the interpretation of user-reported measures. Objective: The main objectives were to (1) evaluate the psychometric performance of an 11-item web-based questionnaire of ratings of general practitioners (GPs) currently used in Norway (Legelisten.no) and (2) assess the association between web-based and survey-based patient experience indicators. Methods: We included all published ratings on GPs and practices on Legelisten.no in the period of May 5, 2012, to December 15, 2021 (N=76,521). The questionnaire consists of 1 mandatory item and 10 voluntary items with 5 response categories (1 to 5 stars), alongside an open-ended review question and background variables. Questionnaire dimensionality and internal consistency were assessed with Cronbach α, exploratory factor, and item response theory analyses, and a priori hypotheses were developed for assessing construct validity (chi-square analysis). We calculated Spearman correlations between web-based ratings and reference patient experience indicators based on survey data using the patient experiences with the GP questionnaire (n=5623 respondents for a random sample of 50 GPs). Results: Web-based raters were predominantly women (n=32,074, 64.0%), in the age range of 20-50 years (n=35,113, 74.6%), and reporting 5 or fewer consultations with the GP each year (n=28,798, 64.5%). Ratings were missing for 18.9% (n=14,500) to 27.4% (n=20,960) of nonmandatory items. A total of 4 of 11 rating items showed a U-shaped distribution, with >60% reporting 5 stars. Factor analysis and internal consistency testing identified 2 rating scales: "GP" (5 items; α=.98) and "practice" (6 items; α=.85). Some associations were not consistent with a priori hypotheses and allowed only partial confirmation of the construct validity of ratings. Item response theory analysis results were adequate for the "practice" scale but not for the "GP" scale, with items with inflated discrimination (>5) distributed over a narrow interval of the scale. The correlations between the web-based ratings GP scale and GP reference indicators ranged from 0.34 (P=.021) to 0.44 (P=.002), while the correlation between the web-based ratings practice scale and reference indicators ranged from 0.17 (not significant) to 0.49 (P<.001). The strongest correlations between web-based and survey scores were found for items measuring practice-related experiences: phone availability (ρ=0.51), waiting time in the office (ρ=0.62), other staff (ρ=0.54-0.58; P<.001). Conclusions: The practice scale of the web-based ratings has adequate psychometric performance, while the GP suffers from important limitations. The associations with survey-based patient experience indicators were accordingly mostly weak to modest. Our study underlines the importance of interpreting web-based ratings with caution and the need to further develop rating sites.

Preliminary validation of the Norwegian version of the Berlin Misophonia Questionnaire Revised (BMQ‐R‐NOR)

The Berlin Misophonia Questionnaire Revised (BMQ-R): Development and validation of a symptom-oriented diagnostical instrument for the measurement of misophonia.

Assessing Misophonia in Young Adults: The Prevalence and Psychometric Validation of the MisoQuest Questionnaire

Prevalence and clinical correlates of misophonia symptoms in the general population of Germany

Measuring misophonia in youth: A psychometric evaluation of child and parent measures

Test-retest reliability and validity of the Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire in Denmark

The Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire (NORPEQ): cross-national comparison of data quality, internal consistency and validity in four Nordic countries

Psychometric properties of the PROMIS-57 questionnaire, Norwegian version

The New York Misophonia Scale (NYMS): A New Instrument to Identify Misophonia in the General Population

Translation, cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the evidence-based practice profile

The Otitis Media-6 questionnaire: psychometric properties with emphasis on factor structure and interpretability

An Automated Online Measure for Misophonia: The Sussex Misophonia Scale for Adults

Face validity and reliability test of the Danish version of the compliance questionnaire rheumatology in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

Audiological Characteristics of a Sample of Adults With Misophonia

A neuropsychological study of misophonia

The Norwegian version of the Personal Feelings Questionnaire-2: clinical utility and psychometric properties

Misophonia: Phenomenology, comorbidity and demographics in a large sample

Validation of the olfactory disorders questionnaire for English‐speaking patients with olfactory disorders

Web-Based Public Ratings of General Practitioners in Norway: Validation Study

Validation of the short version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for adolescents in Norway

Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire