Abstract:Introduction Public policymakers are increasingly engaged in participatory model building processes, such as group model building. Understanding the impacts of policymaker participation in these processes on policymakers is important given that their decisions often have significant influence on the dynamics of complex systems that affect health. Little is known about the extent to which the impacts of participatory model building on public policymakers have been evaluated or the methods and measures used to evaluate these impacts. Methods and analysis A scoping review protocol was developed with the objectives of: (1) scoping studies that have evaluated the impacts of facilitated participatory model building processes on public policymakers who participated in these processes; and (2) describing methods and measures used to evaluate impacts and the main findings of these evaluations. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Population, Concept, Context framework was used to formulate the article identification process. Seven electronic databases—MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete and PsycInfo—will be searched. Identified articles will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for scoping reviews will be used and reported. A data extraction tool will collect information across three domains: study characteristics, methods and measures, and findings. The review will be conducted using Covidence, a systematic review data management platform. Ethics and dissemination The scoping review produced will generate an overview of how public policymaker engagement in participatory model building processes has been evaluated. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and to communities of practice that convene policymakers in participatory model building processes. This review will not require ethics approval because it is not human subject research.

Process models of governmental resource allocation and program evaluation

Cost-effective Use of Evaluation Models: an Empirical Cross-National Investigation

The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device

The Importance of Social and Government Learning in Ex Ante Policy Evaluation

How and When Democratic Values Matter: Challenging the Effectiveness-Centric Framework in Program Evaluation

Resource allocation for English local government: a critique of the four-block model

Social Decision-Making Analysis: a general approach to inform decisions on resources in the public sector

The balancing role of evaluation mechanisms in organizational governance—The case of publicly funded research institutions

Price Discrimination and Federal Project Grants

The Generalized Roy Model and the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs

Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol

Strategic Evaluation: Subjects, Evaluators, and Society

Cutback management strategies and citizen evaluation of government

A critical realist approach to systems thinking in evaluation

Construction on Performance Evaluation System of Financial Expenditure Based on Logic Model: Taking the Agricultural Expenditure as an Example

Policy evaluation for temporal and/or spatial dependent experiments

Hows and Whys of Artificial Intelligence for Public Sector Decisions: Explanation and Evaluation

Evaluating the Health Impact of Large-Scale Public Policy Changes: Classical and Novel Approaches

Selecting Criterion and Limitation of Policy Evaluation Model

A Full Bayesian Model to Handle Structural Ones and Missingness in Economic Evaluations from Individual-Level Data