Abstract:Today's students and educators live in the world of Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia and YouTube. These and many other social networking and social media applications are part of the so-called Social Web (i.e., Web 2.0), best characterised by the notions of social interaction, content sharing, and collective intelligence. In addition, today's students, often referred to as digital natives (Prensky, 2001), have spent most of their time on computers, game consoles, digital music players, video cameras, cell phones, as well as the Web itself. Being used to constant engagement and multitasking in their day-to-day activities, students need a high level of social and creative engagement in learning. Traditional teaching approaches favouring passive content consumption, therefore, are no longer applicable and have to be substituted, or at least complemented, with highly interactive learning processes. The importance of interactivity in learning is emphasised in modern learning theories (Muirhead & Juwah, 2004). For example, Connectivism recognises that the digital and networked nature of our daily lives requires learning which occurs through interaction with various sources of knowledge and participation in communities of common interest, social networks, and group tasks (Siemens, 2005). This learning theory also emphasises the important role that the technology plays in the learning process and the connection of individuals with technology as well as with other individuals through technology. Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of online social interaction in the learning process. Positive aspects of online interaction with teachers and peers include (but are not restricted to) the following: access to peer and expert knowledge, ability to receive feedback from teachers and peers, and an opportunity to reflect on the exchanged messages (Ellis, 2001). By expressing their thoughts, discussing and challenging the ideas of others, and working together towards a group solution to a given problem, students develop critical thinking skills as well as skills of self-reflection and co-construction of knowledge and meaning (Brindley, Walti, & Blaschke, 2009). However, researchers and practitioners alike have found that interactions cannot be easily established in a learning environment. This often comes as a result of an inappropriate course design (Brindley et al., 2009) and/or the students' lack of collaboration skills, such as decision-making, consensus building, and dealing with conflict (Finegold & Cooke, 2006). Therefore, in order to yield the expected educational benefits, the technology in general and social networking tools in particular have to be accompanied with a sound pedagogical approach. In current learning practices, the acceptance of social networking tools (and the broader category of social software tools) is still primarily led by education enthusiasts who, trying to make their classes more engaging for students, turn to these popular online tools and make them part of their teaching practices. However, evidence is still lacking as to whether and to what extent these tools are beneficial for education. A growing number of researchers (e.g., Ala-Mutka et al., 2009; Minocha, 2009) and research projects (e.g., iCamp http://www.icamp.eu/ and Horizon Project http://www.nmc.org/horizon) in technology-enhanced learning have explored the potentials of these tools and reported benefits but also drawbacks and challenges for their applications in educational settings. While some authors even consider that further development of social networking tools and Social Web in general would eventually lead to disruptive innovations in education (see Christensen, Johnson, & Horn, 2008), there are also authors who are sceptical about these tools and their educational potentials (e.g., Bugeja, 2006). This special section on Social Networking, Teaching and Learning, therefore, aims to provide some additional insights into the educational potential of social networking, which despite some observed disadvantages is expect to be increasingly present in educational practices. …

How We Learn About Our Networked World

Individual Differences in Learning Social and Non-Social Network Structures

Brain Network Architecture: Implications for Human Learning

Research on Construction of Personalized Learning Enviroments Based on Social Network

Functional brain network architecture supporting the learning of social networks in humans

New elements for a network (including brain) general theory during learning period

Long-horizon associative learning explains human sensitivity to statistical and network structures in auditory sequences

Learning from Networks

What are essential concepts about networks?

A Network Science Perspective to Personalized Learning

Structure and influence in an interconnected world: neurocomputational mechanism of real-time distributed learning on social networks

The brain as a probabilistic transducer: an evolutionarily plausible network architecture for knowledge representation, computation, and behavior

Learning with incomplete information - and the mathematical structure behind it

Wired to Connect: Evolutionary Psychology and Social Networks

Neurocomputational Mechanism of Real-Time Distributed Learning on Social Networks

A Technological Revolution : Social Learning and Networking

Social Networking, Teaching, and Learning

Compressed higher-order structures facilitate human knowledge network learning

Human Sensitivity to Community Structure Is Robust to Topological Variation

The network architecture of value learning