Abstract:ObjectivesTo compare the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML)–based computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion mapping for functional assessment of coronary stenosis.MethodsBetween October 2020 and March 2022, consecutive participants with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled and underwent coronary CTA, cardiac MR, and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) within 2 weeks. Cardiac MR perfusion analysis was quantified by stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). Hemodynamically significant stenosis was defined as FFR ≤ 0.8 or > 90% stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR, MBF, and MPR was compared, using invasive FFR as a reference.ResultsThe study protocol was completed in 110 participants (mean age, 62 years ± 8; 73 men), and hemodynamically significant stenosis was detected in 36 (33%). Among the quantitative perfusion indices, MPR had the largest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.90) for identifying hemodynamically significant stenosis, which is in comparison with ML-based CT-FFR on the vessel level (AUC 0.89, p = 0.71), with comparable sensitivity (89% vs 79%, p = 0.20), specificity (87% vs 84%, p = 0.48), and accuracy (88% vs 83%, p = 0.24). However, MPR outperformed ML-based CT-FFR on the patient level (AUC 0.96 vs 0.86, p = 0.03), with improved specificity (95% vs 82%, p = 0.01) and accuracy (95% vs 81%, p < 0.01).ConclusionML-based CT-FFR and quantitative cardiac MR showed comparable diagnostic performance in detecting vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, whereas quantitative perfusion mapping had a favorable performance in per-patient analysis.Clinical relevance statementML-based CT-FFR and MPR derived from cardiac MR performed well in diagnosing vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, both of which showed no statistical discrepancy with each other.Key Points• Both machine learning (ML)–based computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and quantitative perfusion cardiac MR performed well in the detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis.• Compared with stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) from quantitative perfusion cardiac MR, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) provided higher diagnostic performance for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.• ML-based CT-FFR and MPR from quantitative cardiac MR perfusion yielded similar diagnostic performance in assessing vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, whereas MPR had a favorable performance in per-patient analysis.Graphical Abstract

Influence of diabetes mellitus on the diagnostic performance of machine learning–based coronary CT angiography–derived fractional flow reserve: a multicenter study

Effect of lesion characteristics on diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve: exploring the indications for application based on CT-FFR CHINA trial (Preprint)

Prognostic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization

Impact of machine learning–based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

The effect of coronary calcification on diagnostic performance of machine learning–based CT-FFR: a Chinese multicenter study

Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes.

Diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography for detection of lesion-specific ischemia: A multi-center study and meta-analysis

On-Site Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Management of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The TARGET Randomized Trial

The Influence of Image Quality on Diagnostic Performance of a Machine Learning–based Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary CT Angiography

Diagnostic Performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd)-Based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Derived from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) for Assessing Functional Severity of Coronary Lesions

Exploration of fractional flow reservation score based on artificial intelligence post-processing for coronary artery lesions in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease

Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning Based CT-FFR in Detecting Ischemia in Myocardial Bridging and Concomitant Proximal Atherosclerotic Disease.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived FFR for Coronary Lesion-Specific Ischemia Based on Deep Learning Analysis

A 2-year investigation of the impact of the computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve calculated using a deep learning algorithm on routine decision-making for coronary artery disease management

Global trans-lesional computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve gradient is associated with clinical outcomes in diabetic patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography in ischemia-specific coronary artery stenosis and indeterminate lesions: results from a multicenter study in China

Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Stable Angina: Can CT Compete with Angiography?

Machine learning based ischemia-specific stenosis prediction: A Chinese multicenter coronary CT angiography study

Prognostic value of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with diabetes mellitus and unstable angina

Comparison of machine learning–based CT fractional flow reserve with cardiac MR perfusion mapping for ischemia diagnosis in stable coronary artery disease