Abstract 14286: Significance of Nutritional Status in Patients With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

Kuniyasu Ikeoka,Stephen Kimura,Siddhartha Dash,Tarek Hammad,Jun Li,Mehdi Shishehbor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.14286
IF: 37.8
2020-11-17
Circulation
Abstract:Introduction: The nutrition status plays a key role in the pathogenesis of frailty, and is strongly associated with the prognosis of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a widely used, simple, and well established nutritional status screening method. The association between the GNRI and wound healing in patients with CLTI has not been established. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that GNRI is associated with wound healing in patients with CLTI. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis for 172 consecutive CLTI patients who were admitted to our hospital from August 2017 to April 2019 (age 70±14 years; men 62.2%). The GNRI on admission was calculated as follows: [14.89 х albumin (g/dL)] + [41.7 х (bodyweight/ideal body weight)]. According to the GNRI values, 4 grades of nutrition-related risk are defined as major risk (GNRI:<82), moderate risk (GNRI: 82 to 98). The amputation-free survival (AFS) and the cumulative wound healing rate are calculated by the log-rank test. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to obtain a cutoff value for wound heal. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to explore the independent association between the GNRI and wound heal. Results: The follow-up period was 12±6.7 months. The 1-year AFS in no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and major risk groups were 90%, 74%, 66%, and 62%, respectively ( P =0.045). GNRI was significantly associated with WIfI wound score (W1, 95±8.8; W2, 87±8.0; W3, 84±9.3, P <0.001). The 1-year cumulative wound healing rate in no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and major risk groups were 56%, 45%, 37%, and 32%, respectively ( P =0.036). GNRI=95 was selected as cutoff value with maximum discriminative power for wound healing (sensitivity 70%, specificity 60%; Area under the curve, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.76). GNRI>95 was an independent predictor of wound healing (Hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.7; P =0.046). Conclusions: The GNRI was significantly associated with AFS and wound healing in patients with CLTI. GNRI=95 is a novel cutoff value to predict wound healing during follow-up.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?