Abstract:Background: The rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery is rising worldwide. With the confluence of these trends, the labor induction rate in trials of labor after cesarean can be as high as 27-32.7%. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean (IOLAC) is a high-risk procedure mainly due to the higher risk of uterine rupture. Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers IOLAC as an option in motivated and informed women in the appropriate care setting. We sought to identify predictors of a composite of maternal and newborn adverse outcomes following IOLAC. Methods: The electronic medical records of women who delivered between January 2018 to September 2022 in a Malaysian university hospital were screened to identify cases of IOLAC. A case is classified as a composite adverse outcome if at least one of these 11 adverse outcomes of delivery blood loss ≥ 1000 ml, uterine scar complications, cord prolapse or presentation, placenta abruption, maternal fever (≥ 38 0C), chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical artery cord artery blood pH < 7.1 or base excess ≤-12 mmol/l, and neonatal ICU admission was present. An unplanned cesarean delivery was not considered an adverse outcome as the practical management alternative for a clinically indicated IOLAC was a planned cesarean. Bivariate analysis of participants' characteristics was performed to identify predictors of their association with composite adverse outcome. Characteristics with crude p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis model. Results: Electronic medical records of 19,064 women were screened. 819 IOLAC cases and 98 cases with composite adverse outcomes were identified. Maternal height, ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, indication of previous cesarean, indication for IOLAC, and method of IOLAC had p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis and were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. After adjustment, only maternal height and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon remained significant at p < 0.05. Post hoc adjusted analysis that included all unplanned cesarean as an added qualifier for composite adverse outcome showed higher body mass index, short stature (< 157 cm), not of Chinese ethnicity, no prior vaginal delivery, prior cesarean indicated by labor dystocia, and less favorable Bishop score (< 6) were independent predictors of the expanded composite adverse outcome. Conclusion: Shorter women and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon were independently predictive of composite of adverse outcome.

Adjusting models to better predict obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) in forceps‐assisted vaginal deliveries: A retrospective cross‐sectional trial

Predicting Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries among Laboring Women: 2 Prediction Models and 1 Risk Calculator

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18‐years of real‐world data

Beyond the numbers: Impact of obesity on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) outcomes in women

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and the role of episiotomy: A retrospective series of 496 cases

Midterm complications after primary obstetrical anal sphincter injury repair in France

How time influences episiotomy utilization and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)

Short stature and vaginal dinoprostone as independent predictors of composite maternal-newborn adverse outcomes in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a retrospective cohort study

Incidence of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries After Training to Protect the Perineum

Maternal origin matters: Country of birth as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries

Prediction of intrapartum caesarean section in vaginal breech birth: development of models for nulliparous and multiparous women

Association between obstetrical anal sphincter injury and postpartum urinary retention: a contemporary nationwide cohort study

The impact of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on the interpregnancy interval and pregnancy complications of subsequent delivery: A retrospective study

Obstetric anal sphincter injury after episiotomy in vacuum extraction: an epidemiological study using an emulated randomised trial approach

Mediolateral episiotomy and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and adverse neonatal outcomes during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women: a propensity-score analysis

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions

A Prediction Model for Pelvic Floor Recovery After Vaginal Birth With Risk Factors

Maternal age and body mass index and risk of labor dystocia after spontaneous labor onset among nulliparous women: A clinical prediction model

Management after obstetric anal sphincter injury: anorectal manometry and symptoms predict long-term fecal incontinence

Prevention and Management of Severe Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs): a National Survey of Nurse- Midwives

Évolution du taux d’épisiotomies et des lésions obstétricales du sphincter de l’anus depuis les recommandations de 2018