Abstract:Abstract We introduce the Speculative Influence Network (SIN) to decipher the causal relationships between sectors (and/or firms) during financial bubbles. The SIN is constructed in two steps. First, we develop a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) of regime-switching between a normal market phase represented by a geometric Brownian motion and a bubble regime represented by the stochastic super-exponential Sornette and Andersen (Int J Mod Phys C 13(2):171–188, 2002) bubble model. The calibration of the HMM provides the probability at each time for a given security to be in the bubble regime. Conditional on two assets being qualified in the bubble regime, we then use the transfer entropy to quantify the influence of the returns of one asset i onto another asset j, from which we introduce the adjacency matrix of the SIN among securities. We apply our technology to the Chinese stock market during the period 2005–2008, during which a normal phase was followed by a spectacular bubble ending in a massive correction. We introduce the Net Speculative Influence Intensity variable as the difference between the transfer entropies from i to j and from j to i, which is used in a series of rank ordered regressions to predict the maximum loss (%MaxLoss) endured during the crash. The sectors that influenced other sectors the most are found to have the largest losses. There is some predictability obtained by using the transfer entropy involving industrial sectors to explain the %MaxLoss of financial institutions but not vice versa. We also show that the bubble state variable calibrated on the Chinese market data corresponds well to the regimes when the market exhibits a strong price acceleration followed by clear change of price regimes. Our results suggest that SIN may contribute significant skill to the development of general linkage-based systemic risks measures and early warning metrics.

Wealth Redistribution in Bubbles and Crashes

Asset bubbles and wealth inequality

Risk attitude, financial literacy and household consumption: Evidence from stock market crash in China

Wealthy individual investors and stock markets' tail risk

Role of Diversification Risk in Financial Bubbles

Risk-return Tradeoff and Serial Correlation in the Chinese Stock Market: A Bailout-Driven Crash Feedback Hypothesis

Bubble Diagnosis and Prediction of the 2005-2007 and 2008-2009 Chinese stock market bubbles

Excess Liquidity and Credit Misallocation: Evidence from China

Riding the Credit Boom

Bubble-Creating Stock Market Attacks: Widespread Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Public Housing into Private Assets: Wealth Creation in Urban China

Real-Time Prediction and Post-Mortem Analysis of the Shanghai 2015 Stock Market Bubble and Crash

Monetary Policy and Wealth Inequality: Evidence from China

The Increasing Inequality of Wealth in China

Excess Comovement and Individual Investors: Direct Evidence from China's Bank Stocks

“Speculative Influence Network” during financial bubbles: application to Chinese stock markets

Digital Finance and Wealth Inequality: Evidence from a Big Tech Platform in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Research on multiple bubbles in China's multi-level stock market

Winners, Losers, and Regulators in a Derivatives Market Bubble

Do the Rich Have an Informational Advantage ? Evidence Based on Account Classifications of Individual Investors

Crash and jackpot probability anomalies in the Chinese stock market