Abstract:BACKGROUND: Children with severe food allergies can benefit from a personalized care project (PCP) in schools. The usefulness of the PCP and the residual risk of allergic emergencies are poorly appreciated. The objective was to evaluate the efficiency of the management plan and the training in the use of the emergency kit.METHODS: A telephone survey using a detailed questionnaire was performed in 45 families whose children had been previously referred to the department. The distribution of disorders was as follows: asthma, 37.7%; atopic dermatitis and asthma, 28.8%; atopic dermatitis, 15.5%; angioedema and urticaria, 13.3%; and anaphylactic shock, 4.2%. Food allergy had been diagnosed in the 45 children by past history, and double-blind or single-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs, or SBPCFCs) with evidence of specific IgE. Exactly 75.5% of the children had peanut allergy. Multiple food allergies characterized 46.8% of the subjects. They had benefited from a strict elimination diet and a protocol for emergency care including a ready-to-use intramuscular epinephrine injection. A PCP had been requested by the School Public Health Service.RESULTS: Thirty-nine PCPs were implemented (86.5% of the requests). They represented 63% of the PCPs for food allergy in the eastern region of France: one per 5800 school-age children. The retrospective period of evaluation was 25 months on average. The types of meals were very diverse, and medically acceptable in 83% of cases. The place where the emergency kit was stored in the school varied. Forty reactions occurred in 33% of the children (5/6 times in the absence of a PCP), asthma in 28%, shock in 1%, and immediate skin reactions in 11%. Reactions occurred at home in 78% of the subjects, and in school in 22% of the subjects. The cause of the reactions was not specifically known in 63% of cases. Twenty-seven percent of the reactions were linked to the ingestion of food allergens. In 10% of subjects, the reaction was due to a modification of ingredients by the food industry.CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of respiratory symptoms during oral challenge tests was confirmed by the frequency of asthmatic reactions within the follow-up period. The role of hidden allergens and of misleading labeling validates the need for PCPs in the case of peanut and tree nut allergies, past history of severe reactions, multiple food allergies, reactions to a low dose in DBPCFCs, and asthmatic reactions to foods. This study provides encouraging data on the usefulness of PCPs and confirms the need for thorough instruction and training of the school staff in dealing with allergic emergencies. Addition of a beta-agonist spray to the emergency kit is suggested.

Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis

Outcomes Associated with Prehospital Epinephrine in Adult and Pediatric Anaphylaxis Patients

Management of anaphylaxis after pre-hospital epinephrine use in children with food-induced anaphylaxis

Increased Use of Adrenaline in the Management of Childhood Anaphylaxis Over the Last Decade

Clinical Features and Treatment of Pediatric Patients with Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: a Study Based on Pharmacovigilance Data

Current Situation of Treatment for Anaphylaxis in a Japanese Pediatric Emergency Center

Factors influencing emergency department observation time following anaphylaxis: a systematic review

Anaphylaxis in children: Effect of age and atopic status

Tryptase in drug-induced anaphylaxis: the need for acute and baseline values

Adrenaline intravenous therapy persistence grade I severe allergic reaction: A case report and literature review

A Health Economic Analysis of Non-injectable Epinephrine Compared with Intramuscular Epinephrine

Anaphylaxis in Children: Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Management

DELAYED, PERSISTENT ANAPHYLAXIS AFTER AN ALLERGY INJECTION

Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis: Preclinical Study of Pharmacokinetics after Sublingual Administration of Taste-Masked Tablets for Potential Pediatric Use

Investigation of the underuse of adrenaline (epinephrine) and prognosis among patients with anaphylaxis at emergency department admission

Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children

Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Management of Biphasic Anaphylaxis

Food anaphylaxis in schools: evaluation of the management plan and the efficiency of the emergency kit

Use of Epinephrine in Patients with Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: an Analysis of the Beijing Pharmacovigilance Database

Safety of rush immunotherapy using a modified schedule: a cumulative experience of 893 patients receiving multiple aeroallergens

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evidence of adrenaline administered via auto-injector for anaphylactic reactions: A review of literature