Comparison of atmospheric and gas-pressurized oxidative torrefaction of heavy-metal-polluted rice straw

Mengjiao Tan,Hui Li,Zhongliang Huang,Zhiwei Wang,Ruoxuan Xiong,Shilin Jiang,Jiachao Zhang,Zijian Wu,Changzhu Li,Lin Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124636
IF: 11.1
2021-02-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:The oxidative torrefaction of rice straw polluted by heavy metals was carried out in a tube reactor (atmospheric pressure, AP) and an autoclave (gas-pressurized, GP), in order to compare the effects of the torrefaction temperature, carrier gas composition, and reactor type on torrefied products’ properties. Compared with the AP, the GP-torrefied rice straw had a lower solid yield, volatile matter, fixed carbon, hydrogen and oxygen contents, lower overall colour change (ΔE), combustion characteristic factor (S N), but a higher bulk density, higher heating value, ash and carbon content, higher combustion temperatures (T i and T f) and fuel ratio. The weight loss, volatile matter, element, higher heating values and combustion characteristics of the AP-torrefied rice straw showed good correlations with its colour parameters, which indicating that it is technically feasible to identification and prediction by the human eye of AP-torrefied RS at the industrial level. However, higher amount of typical heavy metals remained in the GP-torrefied solid products with lower biological availability, indicating that GP torrefaction can be utilized as a low-cost and safe pre-treatment for heavy-metal-polluted rice straw at the industrial scale.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?