Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews

Hamad Abdel Hadi,Faiha Eltayeb,Sara Al Balushi,Joanne Daghfal,Faraz Ahmed,Ceu Mateus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13030253

2024-03-12

Antibiotics

Abstract:Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) were introduced in healthcare as a public health priority to promote appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials, to reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials, as well as to control the escalating challenges of antimicrobial resistance. To deliver aimed outcome objectives, ASPs involve multiple connected implementation process measures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate both concepts of ASPs. Guided by PRISMA frames, published systematic reviews (SR) focusing on ASPs restricted to secondary and tertiary healthcare were evaluated over the past 10 years involving all age groups. Out of 265 identified SR studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in Europe and North America, with limited studies from other regions. In the reviewed studies, all age groups were examined, although they were conducted mainly on adults when compared to children and infants. Both process and outcomes measures of ASPs were examined equally and simultaneously through 25 different concepts, dominated by efficacy, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact, while information technology as well as role of pharmacy and behavioral factors were equally examined. The main broad conclusions from the review were that, across the globe, ASPs demonstrated effectiveness, proved efficacy, and confirmed efficiency, while focused evaluation advocated that developed countries should target medium- and small-sized hospitals while developing countries should continue rolling ASPs across healthcare facilities. Additionally, the future of ASPs should focus on embracing evolving information technology to bridge the gaps in knowledge, skills, and attitude, as well as to enhance appropriate decision making.

pharmacology & pharmacy,infectious diseases

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the implementation process, impact, and outcomes of hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs). Specifically, the paper aims to comprehensively evaluate the implementation of ASPs in different regions and age groups and their effects on medical quality, antimicrobial use, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact through a systematic review method. In addition, the paper also explores the roles of information technology, pharmacists' roles, and behavioral factors in ASPs, in order to provide guiding suggestions for the future development of ASPs.

The core objectives of the paper are:
1. **Evaluate the implementation process of ASPs**: including the promotion strategies of ASPs, implementation measures, and the formulation and compliance of relevant guidelines.
2. **Analyze the impact and outcomes of ASPs**: mainly focus on the effectiveness of ASPs in reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use, controlling antimicrobial resistance, improving patient safety, and economic benefits.
3. **Examine specific service improvement concepts**: such as the application of information technology, the role of pharmacists, behavioral intervention measures, etc., and how these factors promote the effective implementation and optimization of ASPs.
4. **Provide a comprehensive evaluation from a global perspective**: by systematically reviewing the research in the past decade, summarize the implementation effects of ASPs worldwide, especially the differences and challenges between developed and developing countries.

In summary, through the comprehensive analysis of a large number of systematic review studies, this paper aims to provide scientific basis and practical guidance for more effective implementation and optimization of ASPs globally.