Abstract:The disclosure of ESG tasks, seen as companies' performance of sustainability, has gradually became a necessity for listed enterprises. From an ESG perspective, this paper revisits and restructures the sustainable supplier evaluation criteria. Leveraging thematic analysis, this study dissected ESG reporting guidelines across stock exchanges and explored ESG annual reports and supplier codes of conduct from the listed firms. This elucidated the evaluation criteria currently in practice. The findings indicate that existing sustainable supplier evaluations cannot fully meet ESG regulatory requirements. Drawing insights from these gaps, we reconstructed the evaluation criteria through text analysis to better align with ESG mandates. This study introduces the concept of a "Relative Word Frequency Ratio" to analyze the importance of each indicator and to further determine which to retain or delete. This research offers a robust theoretical foundation and practical guidance for enhancing supplier sustainability evaluations, and the proposed sustainable supplier evaluation criteria system could provide a decision-making reference for enterprises in the choice of ESG-qualified suppliers.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to solve the problem of inconsistency between corporate sustainable supplier evaluation criteria and ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) requirements. Specifically, the research mainly focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Limitations of current evaluation criteria**:
- Existing sustainable supplier evaluation criteria mainly focus on the economic dimension, such as cost, quality, delivery time, etc., while relatively less attention is paid to the environmental and social dimensions.
- With the increasing importance of ESG standards, the existing evaluation criteria cannot fully meet ESG regulatory requirements.
2. **Integration of ESG standards**:
- The paper attempts to re - examine and reconstruct the evaluation criteria for sustainable suppliers from the perspective of ESG. Through the text analysis method, the researchers analyzed the ESG report guidelines of different stock exchanges and explored the ESG annual reports of listed companies and supplier codes of conduct to understand the evaluation criteria used in current practice.
- The research found that the existing sustainable supplier evaluation criteria cannot fully meet ESG regulatory requirements, so improvements are needed based on these gaps.
3. **New evaluation criteria system**:
- In order to better align with ESG requirements, the paper introduced the concept of "Relative Word Frequency Ratio" (R) to analyze the importance of each indicator and further determine which indicators should be retained or deleted.
- A new set of sustainable supplier evaluation criteria system was proposed, providing a decision - making reference for enterprises to select ESG - compliant suppliers.
4. **Theoretical and practical contributions**:
- This research not only provides practical guidance for enterprises to evaluate the sustainability capabilities of suppliers during the ESG transformation process, but also lays a theoretical foundation for the construction of future sustainable supplier selection decision - making models.
### Formula Explanation
To ensure the scientific and accurate nature of the evaluation criteria, the paper introduced the "Relative Word Frequency Ratio" (R), and its calculation formula is as follows:
\[
R_{ki}=\frac{ET_{ki}}{TT_{k}}, \quad i = 1,2,\cdots,n; \quad k = 1,2,\cdots,m
\]
where:
- \(ET_{ki}\) represents the number of occurrences of the \(i\) - th initial category in the \(k\) - th dimension;
- \(TT_{k}\) represents the total number of occurrences of all initial category indicators in the \(k\) - th dimension;
- \(n\) represents the number of initial category indicators;
- \(m\) represents the number of dimensions.
In addition, the sum of the relative word frequency ratios within all dimensions should be equal to 1:
\[
\sum_{i = 1}^{n}R_{ki}=1, \quad i = 1,2,\cdots,n; \quad k = 1,2,\cdots,m
\]
Through this formula, researchers can effectively identify key indicators and provide guidance for the subsequent reconstruction of the evaluation system.
### Summary
In general, this paper is committed to solving the problem of inconsistency between existing sustainable supplier evaluation criteria and ESG requirements, proposing a new evaluation criteria system based on ESG requirements, and providing theoretical and practical guidance for enterprises' ESG transformation.