The effectiveness of transnasal high flow nasal cannula in bronchoscopy under sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chen Wei,Shaoyong Ma,Jingwen Wang,Na Yang,Dandan Wang,Liping Yuan,Yingying Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1428431
IF: 3.9
2024-07-10
Frontiers in Medicine
Abstract:Background The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical application effects of transnasal high flow nasal cannula compared to other conventional modalities for oxygen therapy devices in patients undergoing bronchoscopy. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in multiple English databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to collect relevant studies on the application of high flow nasal cannula in patients undergoing bronchoscopy, and conducted a meta-analysis utilizing RevMan 5.4 software, following the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results A total of 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included, involving 1,631 patients (HFNC group: n = 811, other oxygen therapy group: n = 820). The meta-analysis results demonstrated that HFNC significantly reduced the incidence of hypoxemia and improved the minimum oxygen saturation compared to conventional oxygen therapy (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18–0.41, p < 0.00001; MD = 6.09, 95% CI: 3.73–8.45, p < 0.00001). Furthermore, HFNC showed statistically significant differences when compared to non-invasive ventilation in terms of hypoxemia incidence (RR = 3.52, 95% CI: 1.13–10.97, p = 0.03) and minimum oxygen saturation (MD = −1.97, 95% CI: −2.97-−0.98, p < 0.0001). In addition, HFNC resulted in significantly shorter surgical time and higher PaO2 at the end of the procedure compared to conventional oxygen therapy (MD = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.66–2.40, p = 0.0006; MD = 15.52, 95% CI: 10.12–20.92, p < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in PaCO2, EtCO2, and MAP at the end of the procedure (MD = 1.23, 95% CI: −0.74-3.20, p = 0.22; MD = −0.35, 95% CI: −3.77-3.06, p = 0.84; MD = −0.54, 95% CI: −2.44-1.36, p = 0.58). Conclusion When HFNC or NIV is utilized during the examination and treatment of bronchoscopy patients, both oxygenation modalities enhance oxygenation function and reduce the incidence of hypoxemia compared to conventional oxygen therapy. HFNC can be regarded as a viable alternative to NIV for specific high-risk patients undergoing bronchoscopy. It decreases the duration of bronchoscopy and improves the PaO 2 levels at the end of the procedure, but does not significantly impact the PaCO 2 , EtCO 2 , and mean arterial pressure. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ , identifier 1414374462@qq.com .
medicine, general & internal