DWT and LBP hybrid feature based deep learning technique for image splicing forgery detection

Mahesh K. Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-024-09919-1
IF: 3.732
2024-07-19
Soft Computing
Abstract:Image splicing is a common and informal way to generate forgery images. Two or more than two images merged into one image is called image splicing. Many researchers in the image splicing area continue to face the challenge of splice forgery image recognition. This is why it's crucial to regularly update image forgery detection systems so that they are continuously updated and require more research in this area. The IFC-TC, DVMM, Columbia, and CASIA datasets have been used to evaluate the splicing recognition result of the proposed technique. In this technique initially, the features are extracted by using the DWT and LBP techniques for computing different parameters. Initially, images undergo three layers of DWT, and splitting the image into low- and sub-bands high-frequency occurs after the first level. In addition, by splitting a low-frequency sub-band twice, more information can be extracted, resulting in a three-level DWT. The different parameters computed using LBP and DWT are PPV, TPR, FPR, F-1 score, and accuracy for splicing forgery detection. The different parameters derived from DWT and LBP techniques are compared individually as well as combined. The SVM classifier is used to distinguish among original and spliced image identification. The PPV, TPR, FPR, F-1 Score, and accuracy parameters are 98.88%, 97.59%, 87.51%, 98.53%, and 98.31%, respectively, for the IFC-TC dataset. The PPV, TPR, FPR, F-1 Score, and accuracy parameters are 97.92%, 98.65%, 89.69%, 98.20%, and 98.59%, respectively, for the DVMM dataset. The same PPV, TPR, FPR, F-1 Score, and accuracy parameters were calculated for the Columbia and CASIA datasets, and the results were compared using the existing technique.
computer science, artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary applications
What problem does this paper attempt to address?