Abstract:BackgroundIgE-mediated allergic diseases can be considered a modern epidemic, with exponential growth mainly in industrialized countries. Diagnosis is usually based on detailed medical history, physical examination, skin or challenge test and the determination of allergen-specific serum IgE - a laboratory test that has become a high-value tool in the allergy patient's journey over the last three decades. As the identification of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) for a given allergen is important to aid in the allergy diagnosis, several methods for detecting IgE in vitro are available worldwide and, in recent years, there have been several improvements in laboratory methodologies bringing greater advances in terms of clinical and analytical performance. The study aims to evaluate the clinical performance and correlation between two different sIgE assays (IMMULITE® 2000 3gAllergyTM and ImmunoCAP) and their concordance with Skin Prick Test (SPT) and clinical history.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted with approximately 130 consecutive patients who underwent evaluation of allergic diseases in different centers in Brazil. Clinical data, blood samples, and SPT results were collected. With the blood samples, the allergens D1, D2 and D201 were evaluated using both methods (IMMULITE® 2000 3gAllergyTM and ImmunoCAP) and the data were evaluated in a correlation study and clinical concordance analysis.ResultsQualitatively evaluating the sIgE results between the two immunoassays, at the cutoff point considered clinically significant (≥ 0.35 KU/L), a total agreement of 95.2% (D1); 95.1% (D2), 91.7% (D201) and 96.8% (Derp2) was observed. Semi-quantitatively evaluating through reactive interpretation, an agreement of 89.5% (D1); 91.06% (D2); 87.60% (D201) and 93.33% (Derp2) was observed. Spearman's correlation between the analytical methods was 0.85 (D1), 0.93 (D2), 0.68 (D201) and 0.76 (Derp2). When compared with the SPT results, a total agreement of 78.7% and 80.1% was obtained for 3gAllergy and ImmunoCAP, respectively, with slightly higher positive agreement for both methods.ConclusionsThe two methods have good agreement with each other, with greater differences when evaluated quantitatively. However, when compared to clinical history and skin prick test results, both perform very similarly with a few differences that may be caused by the difference in the assay design.

Comparison of MAST With Radioallergosorbent and Skin Tests for Diagnosis of Allergy in Children

Comparison of results of skin tests, RAST, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis

Correlation of Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test with Nasal Provocation Test of House Dust Mite

Evaluation of the clinical performance of multiple serum sIgE detection systems based on component-resolved diagnosis

Validity of MAST-CLA for diagnosis of arthropod allergy using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis

A comparison of skin prick tests, intradermal skin tests, and RASTs in the diagnosis of cat allergy

Correlation of Skin Test Results and Specific Immunoglobulin E Blood Levels with Nasal Provocation Testing for House-Dust Mite Allergies

B-056 Clinical and Analytical Performance Evaluation of Two Immunoassays for the Detection of Mite Specific Serum IgE for Allergy Diagnosis

Sensitivity and specificity of standardised allergen extracts in skin prick test for diagnoses of IgE-mediated respiratory allergies

Disagreement between skin prick test and specific IgE in young children

Optimization of skin testing. II. Evaluation of concentration and cutoff values, as compared with RAST and clinical history, in a multicenter study

Test Results Analysis of Pediatric Asthma Allergens

Comparison between Specific Immunoglobulin E and Skin Prick Test for Diagnosis of Allergic Patients

Alternative to In Vivo Tests During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Tests as a Useful First Screening

Allergen-specific IgE: comparison between skin prick test and serum assay in real life

Comparison of wheat and rye flour solutions for skin prick testing: a multi-centre study (Stad 1)

Optimization of skin testing. I. Choosing allergen concentrations and cutoff values by factorial design

Skin Prick Automated Test device offers more reliable allergy test results compared to a manual skin prick test

Sensitivity of the Skin Prick Test and Specificity of the Serum-Specific IgE Test for Airway Responsiveness to House Dust Mites in Asthma

Hay fever and predictive value of prick test and specific IgE antibodies: A prospective study in children