Abstract:Background: The transition to a climate neutral society such as that envisaged in the European Union Green Deal requires careful and comprehensive planning. Integrated assessment models (IAMs) and energy system optimisation models (ESOMs) are both commonly used for policy advice and in the process of policy design. In Europe, a vast landscape of these models has emerged and both kinds of models have been part of numerous model comparison and model linking exercises. However, IAMs and ESOMs have rarely been compared or linked with one another. Methods: This study conducts an explorative comparison and identifies possible flows of information between 11 of the integrated assessment and energy system models in the European Climate and Energy Modelling Forum. The study identifies and compares regional aggregations and commonly reported variables. We define harmonised regions and a subset of shared result variables that enable the comparison of scenario results across the models. Results: The results highlight how power generation and demand development are related and driven by regional and sectoral drivers. They also show that demand developments like for hydrogen can be linked with power generation potentials such as onshore wind power. Lastly, the results show that the role of nuclear power is related to the availability of wind resources. Conclusions: This comparison and analysis of modelling results across model type boundaries provides modellers and policymakers with a better understanding of how to interpret both IAM and ESOM results. It also highlights the need for community standards for region definitions and information about reported variables to facilitate future comparisons of this kind. The comparison shows that regional aggregations might conceal differences within regions that are potentially of interest for national policy makers thereby indicating a need for national-level analysis.

Looking under the hood: a comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models

Comparing energy system optimization models and integrated assessment models: Relevance for energy policy advice

A systemic approach to analyze integrated energy system modeling tools: A review of national models

Multi-model Comparison of the Economic and Energy Implications for China and India in an International Climate Regime

Integration of energy system and computable general equilibrium models: An approach complementing energy and economic representations for mitigation analysis

Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy

Comparing projections of industrial energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term energy models

Multi-model analyses of the economic and energy implications for China and India in a post-Kyoto climate regime

Evaluation of influential factors on energy system optimisation

Enhancing the Quality of Climate Policy Analysis in China: Linking Bottom-Up and Top-Down Models

Progress of Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Policy

Advanced technologies in energy-economy models for climate change assessment

Synergy of Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Chinese Industries: A Critical Assessment of Energy Models

Why energy models should integrate social and environmental factors: Assessing user needs, omission impacts, and real-word accuracy in the European Union

Decomposing passenger transport futures: Comparing results of global integrated assessment models

System level cost and environmental performance of integrated energy systems: An assessment of low-carbon scenarios for the UK

Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison

Sensitivity of projected long-term CO2 emissions across the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways

Exploring Model-Based Decarbonization and Energy Efficiency Scenarios with PROMETHEUS and TIAM-ECN

Counter-intuitive behaviour of energy system models under CO2 caps and prices

Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models