Chengzhi Zhou,Shiyue Li,Jun Liu,Qian Chu,Liyun Miao,Linbo Cai,Xiuyu Cai,Yu Chen,Fei Cui,Yuchao Dong,Wen Dong,Wenfeng Fang,Yong He,Weifeng Li,Min Li,Wenhua Liang,Gen Lin,Jie Lin,Xinqing Lin,Hongbing Liu,Ming Liu,Xinlin Mu,Yi Hu,Jie Hu,Yang Jin,Ziming Li,Yinyin Qin,Shengxiang Ren,Gengyun Sun,Yihong Shen,Chunxia Su,Kejing Tang,Lin Wu,Mengzhao Wang,Huijuan Wang,Kai Wang,Yuehong Wang,Ping Wang,Hongmei Wang,Qi Wang,Zhijie Wang,Xiaohong Xie,Zhanhong Xie,Xin Xu,Fei Xu,Meng Yang,Boyan Yang,Xiangjun Yi,Xiaoqun Ye,Feng Ye,Zongyang Yu,Dongsheng Yue,Bicheng Zhang,Jian Zhang,Jianqing Zhang,Xiaoju Zhang,Wei Zhang,Wei Zhao,Bo Zhu,Zhengfei Zhu,Wenzhao Zhong,Chunxue Bai,Liangan Chen,Baohui Han,Chengping Hu,Shun Lu,Weimin Li,Yong Song,Jie Wang,Caicun Zhou,Jianying Zhou,Yanbin Zhou,Yuichi Saito,Yoshinobu Ichiki,Hitoshi Igai,Satoshi Watanabe,Sara Bravaccini,Alfonso Fiorelli,Francesco Petrella,Takeo Nakada,Piergiorgio Solli,Nikolaos Tsoukalas,Yuki Kataoka,Taichiro Goto,Rossana Berardi,Jianxing He,Nanshan Zhong

Abstract:Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide (1). The traditional treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and interventional therapy. The survival of lung cancer patients has dramatically been prolonged in recent years with the availability of targeted therapies, antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Meanwhile, technologies for the molecular detection of lung cancer have also advanced rapidly: the detection of single driver genes has evolved to cover combined multi-gene analysis, and whole exome sequencing (WES) has increasingly been applied in the clinical setting. In addition, life support technologies, including ventilators, artificial liver, and artificial kidney as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), have further matured, providing powerful forms of life support for patients with various acute and critical diseases. However, most clinical studies have only enrolled patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scores from 0 to 1, with few patients having PS scores of 2; patients with a PS score of 3 or 4 have been typically excluded. Therefore, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, supportive care is recommended for patients with a PS score of 3 to 4 in the current guidelines. In the real-world, however, approximately 25% of lung cancer patients present with PS score of 3 or 4 (2) or attain scores between 3 and 4 during the course of treatment. Certain patients with high PS scores can benefit from individualized anti-tumor treatment plus appropriate life-support techniques. In 2017, the Lung Cancer Research Team at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College & Institute of Respiratory Diseases for the first time pioneered the concept of “advanced severe lung cancer” (3) and argued that standardized therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) plus anti-tumor therapy can improve both quality of life and prognosis in patients with lung cancer combined with COPD. The authors also found that the early detection of lung cancer driver genes and timely targeted therapy can be successful in treating patients with advanced severe lung adenocarcinoma with a PS score of 4 (4). In 2019, the concept of advanced severe lung cancer was further developed in a featured article (5) that indicated “Advanced severe lung cancer: does not refer to end-stage lung cancer but rather to stage IIIB, IIIC and IV lung cancers with a PS score of 2–4, which can result from a variety of factors related to the disease itself or anti-tumor drugs and which are highly likely to benefit from the currently available systemic anti-tumor therapies”. In recent years, with the advances in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment techniques and life support technologies, more clinical studies have enrolled patients with a PS score of 2, and some real-world studies have enrolled patients with PS scores of 3–4. Even for patients with early-stage lung cancer, studies have shown that patients with poor PS scores and co-morbidities have a reduced chance of undergoing surgery and an increased mortality rate (6); nevertheless, survival benefit may still be obtained through surgical modifications combined with individualized and multidisciplinary treatment (7). Therefore, the concept of severe lung cancer should not be limited to advanced lung cancer, but applied to all lung cancer patients. In particular, due to the increase in treatment options as well as substantially prolonged survival, the majority of patients may have a PS score between 2 and 4 for a certain period of time due to a variety of reasons. How to provide timely and reasonable treatment for these lung cancer patients has become a critically important real-world research topic. Therefore, we invited lung cancer experts at home and abroad to consider this issue, and this group has reached the following consensus.

Certification system for multidisciplinary thoracic tumour boards

Society for Translational Medicine Expert Consensus on Training and Certification Standards for Surgeons and Assistants in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer

Multidisciplinary approach for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 2023 expert consensus of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP

International Consensus on Severe Lung Cancer—the First Edition

Bridging Gaps for Improved Patient Outcomes

Analysis of multidisciplinary lung cancer practice

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus on the Multidisciplinary Management and Resectability of Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Evolving and Improving the Sustainability of Molecular Tumor Boards: The Value and Challenges

Analyzing diagnostic and treatment wait times for lung cancer Patients: Key insights from a provincial registry study

Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on survival in rectal cancer. Population-based analysis in Catalonia (Spain)

Clinical Relevance of Targeted Therapy and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in Lung Cancer

Criteria and indicators to evaluate quality of care in genitourinary tumour boards

Merits and boundaries of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging and Treatment Algorithm: learning from the past to improve the future with a novel proposal.

Breast Cancer Treatment in Integrated Care Process in Andalusia: The Challenge of Multidisciplinarity

Large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma: consensus statement from The British Thoracic Oncology Group and the Association of Pulmonary Pathologists

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

Similarities and differences of lung cancer (LC) multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in China compared to Europe and Canada.

Recommendations for Implementing Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Europe

A multidisciplinary consensus on the morphological and functional responses to immunotherapy treatment

The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care

Tackling challenges in cancer care and improving its governance in the European Union