Improvements in patient‐reported outcomes after treatment with deucravacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomized phase 2 trial

Vibeke Strand,Laure Gossec,Laura C. Coates,Alexis Ogdie,Jiyoon Choi,Brandon Becker,Joe Zhuo,Thomas Lehman,Miroslawa Nowak,Ayanbola Elegbe,Philip J. Mease,Atul Deodhar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25333
2024-03-28
Arthritis Care & Research
Abstract:Objective Deucravacitinib, a TYK‐2 inhibitor, was assessed in a phase 2 trial in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report effects of deucravacitinib from the patient perspective. Methods This phase 2, double‐blind trial (NCT03881059) randomized patients with active PsA 1:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (QD), 12 mg QD, or placebo, for 16 weeks. Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline (CFB) at Week 16 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ‐DI) and 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) physical component summary (PCS) score. Additional patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) assessed disease impact, including fatigue, pain, and mental health. Mean CFB in PROs and percentages of patients reporting improvements with minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) or scores of ≥ normative values were also assessed. Results This study comprised 203 patients (51.2% female; mean [SD] age, 49.8 [13.5] years). At Week 16, adjusted mean difference (95% CI) versus placebo in HAQ‐DI and SF‐36 PCS CFB was significant for each deucravacitinib group (HAQ‐DI 6 mg: −0.26 [−0.42, −0.10], P = 0.0020; HAQ‐DI 12 mg: −0.28 [−0.45, −0.12], P = 0.0008; SF‐36 PCS 6 mg: 3.3 [0.9, 5.7], P = 0.0062; SF‐36 PCS 12 mg: 3.5 [1.1, 5.9], P = 0.0042). MCID at Week 16 were reported for all PROs with either dose of deucravacitinib. Improvements of MCID or to normative values were reported by more patients receiving deucravacitinib than placebo. Conclusion Deucravacitinib demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs versus placebo in patients with active PsA and warrants further study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?