A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach

Pablo A. Pinto-DelaCadena,Vicente Liern,Andrea Vinueza-Cabezas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020324

IF: 2.4

2024-01-19

Mathematics

Abstract:This research focused on decision-making supported by multi-criteria decision methods, specifically TOPSIS, OWA, and their respective variants within personnel selection. The study presented models aimed at facilitating the selection of the best candidate for a job through competency-based assessments and comparing the application of four methods across various scenarios. We employed methods such as TOPSIS, OWA, and two variations (Canós–Liern method and an OWA model based on mathematically replicating expert opinion). Each model provided distinct rankings and demonstrated adaptability to specific situations within a company. Furthermore, it was emphasized that each method could and should be tailored according to the company's reality to derive maximum benefit from its implementation. A crucial aspect of securing the best candidates involves understanding the context and identifying the appropriate methodology.

mathematics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is how to use multi-criteria decision-making methods (such as TOPSIS, OWA, etc.) to select the most suitable candidates for positions in the personnel selection process of human resource management. Specifically, the study aims to provide a practical method for companies to evaluate and select the best candidates by comparing the application of different multi-criteria decision-making methods. The study also emphasizes the importance of adjusting and applying these methods according to the specific circumstances of different companies.

The paper explores different multi-criteria decision-making methods through the following scenarios:

1. **The company already has an ideal candidate profile**: Using distance-based methods (such as the Canós-Liern method) to determine the candidate closest to the ideal profile.
2. **The company does not have an ideal candidate profile**: Adopting the TOPSIS method to evaluate candidates by constructing ideal and anti-ideal solutions.
3. **The company conducts an overall evaluation of candidates without considering specific abilities**: Using the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator for ranking.
4. **The company relies on expert evaluations**: First deriving weights based on expert evaluation results of a few candidates, then applying these weights to more candidates to replicate the expert evaluations.

Through the above methods, the paper aims to help companies better understand the application of various multi-criteria decision-making techniques in the actual selection process and guide companies in choosing the most suitable method according to their own needs.