Abstract:Memory retrieval affects subsequent memory in ways both positive (e.g., the testing effect) and negative (e.g., retrieval-induced forgetting, RIF). The changes to memory that retrieval produces can be thought of as the encoding consequences of retrieval, examined here with respect to attention. In three experiments, participants first studied category-example word pairs, and then practiced retrieval for half the pairs from one-third of the categories (the R + items) and restudied half the pairs from a different third of the categories (the S + items), while the final third of the categories were in the nonpracticed control condition (the Np items). This was followed in turn by a final test over all categories and examples, including the unpracticed examples from the retrieval-practice and restudied categories (the R- and S- items, respectively). The middle phase (of retrieval practice and restudy) was conducted under full attention (FA) or under divided attention (DA) in which participants also performed a distracting secondary task. DA had little effect on final recall in the retrieval practice (R +) condition but significantly reduced final recall of the restudied (S +) items, producing a net increase in the testing effect relative to the FA condition. RIF (measured as the difference between the R- and Np items) was substantial in the FA condition but was eliminated by DA. This occurred because the final recall of R- items significantly increased in the DA compared to FA condition, a highly unusual result in which distraction actually improved an aspect of memory performance. In sum, DA during retrieval practice dissociated the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory, increasing the positive effect, embodied by the testing effect, but decreasing the negative effect, embodied by RIF. The theoretical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Retrieval practice effect and individual differences: current status and future directions

Testing the dual-memory framework: individual differences in the magnitude of the retrieval practice effect and fluid intelligence

Retrieval Practice in Classroom Settings: A Review of Applied Research

The Testing Effect in University Teaching: Using Multiple-Choice Testing to Promote Retention of Highly Retrievable Information

Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: An fMRI study of the testing effect

Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice

Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory.

The dual-process perspective and the benefits of retrieval practice in younger and older adults

Retrieval experience as a modifier of future encoding: Another test effect.

A working memory dependent dual process model of the testing effect

Far transfer of retrieval-practice benefits: rule-based learning as the underlying mechanism

Long-Term Effects of Working Memory Retrieval From Prioritized and Deprioritized States

Retrieval-induced forgetting, delay, and sleep

Improving the Use of Retrieval Practice for Both Easy and Difficult Materials: The Effect of an Instructional Intervention

Low-Stakes Quizzes Improve Learning and Reduce Overconfidence in College Students

Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues

Examining the effect size and duration of retrieval-induced facilitation

Research-to-Resource: Introducing Retrieval Practice in Jazz Pedagogy

Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social task

Is Retrieval-Induced Forgetting an Inhibitory Process?

Neural correlates of retrieval practice on the learning and memory retention of L3 French vocabulary