On Identification of Ambiguity Premium

K. Wakai

2019-03-01

Abstract:Based on the smooth model of decision making under ambiguity as proposed by Klibanoff, Marinacci, and Mukerji (2005, 2009), we derive a method that selects assets whose regression constant from the factor regression captures ambiguity premium.

Economics,Mathematics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Implied Ambiguity: Mean-Variance Inefficiency and Pricing Errors

Chiaki Hara,Toshiki Honda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4097

IF: 5.4

2021-10-28

Management Science

Abstract:We investigate the optimal portfolio choice problem for an investor who has a utility function of the smooth ambiguity model. We identify necessary and sufficient conditions for a given portfolio to be optimal for such an investor. We define the implied ambiguity of a portfolio as the smallest ambiguity aversion coefficient with which the portfolio is optimal, and the measure of ambiguity perception as the part of the variability in asset returns that can be attributed to the ambiguity. We show that there are one-to-one relations between the implied ambiguity, the Sharpe ratio, and the pricing errors when the portfolio is taken as the pricing portfolio, and that the measure of ambiguity perception is determined by the Sharpe ratio and the alpha. Based on the U.S. stock market data, we assess how ambiguity averse the representative investor is and what types of stocks the investor perceives as having more ambiguous returns than others. This paper was accepted by Manel Baucells, behavioral economics and decision analysis.

management,operations research & management science
Ambiguity, Learning, And Asset Returns

Nengjiu Ju,Jianjun Miao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1017034

2012-01-01

Abstract:We propose a novel generalized recursive smooth ambiguity model which permits a three-way separation among risk aversion, ambiguity aversion, and intertemporal substitution. We apply this utility model to a consumption-based asset-pricing model in which consumption and dividends follow hidden Markov regime-switching processes. Our calibrated model can match the mean equity premium, the mean risk-free rate, and the volatility of the equity premium observed in the data. In addition, our model can generate a variety of dynamic asset-pricing phenomena, including the procyclical variation of pricedividend ratios, the countercyclical variation of equity premia and equity volatility, the leverage effect, and the mean reversion of excess returns. The key intuition is that an ambiguity-averse agent behaves pessimistically by attaching more weight to the pricing kernel in bad times when his continuation values are low.
Return Ambiguity, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing

Yu Liu,Hao Wang,Lihong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076606

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We formulate a tractable continuous-time rational expectations model in which the agent is ambiguity averse and would like to robustify asset return specification. Ambiguity affects the portfolio rule and asset pricing both individually and collectively with risk. Independently existing ambiguity premium helps to explain why investors appear to underinvest in risky assets and do not exploit the asymptotic arbitrage opportunity emerged from trading inertia where return volatility (risk) is nearly zero (Campbell and Cochrane, 1999). Calibration of our Lucas-style model to the annual and quarterly U.S. asset prices and consumption data yields a relative risk aversion coefficient of five, and attributes 23%, 41%, and 36% of the equity premium to risk, ambiguity, and their interactions, respectively.
Does Smooth Ambiguity Matter for Asset Pricing?

A. Ronald Gallant,Mohammad R. Jahan-Parvar,Hening Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3090593

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We use the Bayesian method introduced by Gallant and McCulloch (2009) to estimate consumption-based asset pricing models featuring smooth ambiguity preferences. We rely on semi-nonparametric estimation of a flexible auxiliary model in our structural estimation. Based on the market and aggregate consumption data, our estimation provides statistical support for asset pricing models with smooth ambiguity. Statistical model comparison shows that models with ambiguity, learning and time-varying volatility are preferred to the long-run risk model. We analyze asset pricing implications of the estimated models.
A Continuous-Time Asset Pricing Model with Smooth Ambiguity Preferences

Masataka Suzuki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2641478

2016-01-28

Abstract:This study extends the smooth ambiguity preferences model proposed by Klibanoff et al. (2005, 2009) to a continuous-time dynamic setting. It is known that these preferences converge to the subjective expected utility as the time interval shortens so that decision makers do not exhibit any ambiguity-sensitive behavior in the continuous-time limit. Accordingly, this study proposes an alternative model of decision making that applies Yaari’s (1987) dual theory to the original preferences and interchanges the role of the second-order utility function with that of the second-order probability. We then formulate a recursive utility of smooth ambiguity-sensitive decision makers in continuous-time. Our model is represented by the stochastic differential utility with distorted beliefs so that most existing techniques in financial studies can be made applicable together with these distorted beliefs. We give an asset-pricing example to demonstrate the applicability of our model.

Economics
Ambiguity Aversion and Variance Premium

Jianjun Miao,Bin Wei,Hao Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010139219500034

2019-01-01

Quarterly Journal of Finance

Abstract:This paper offers an ambiguity-based interpretation of the variance premium — the difference between risk-neutral and objective expectations of market return variance — as a compounding effect of both belief distortion and variance differential regarding the uncertain economic regimes. Our calibrated model can match the variance premium, the equity premium, and the risk-free rate in the data. We find that about 97% of the mean–variance premium can be attributed to ambiguity aversion. A three-way separation among ambiguity aversion, risk aversion, and intertemporal substitution, permitted by the smooth ambiguity preferences, plays a key role in our model’s quantitative performance.
Optimal Investment and Premium Control for Insurers with Ambiguity

Bing Liu,Ming Zhou,Peng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2019.1568487

2019-01-01

Abstract:In this paper, we consider the optimal investment and premium control problem for insurers who worry about model ambiguity. Different from previous works, we assume that the insurer's surplus process is described by a non-homogeneous compound Poisson model and the insurer has ambiguity on both the financial market and the insurance market. Our purpose is to find the impacts of model ambiguity on optimal policies. With the objective of maximizing the expected utility of terminal wealth, the closed-form solutions of the optimal investment and premium policies are obtained by solving HJB equations. Finally, numerical examples are also given to illustrate the results.
Ambiguity Aversion and Asset Price Dynamics

Louis R. Piccotti,Yangru Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847424

2016-01-01

Abstract:We derive the equilibrium asset expected returns when there is ambiguity in asset expected returns, as well as ambiguity in asset return variances. In our model, ambiguity risk is systematic in nature and is non-diversifiable. Under regularity conditions, expected asset returns are linearly increasing in variance risk and ambiguity risk. We show that a beta pricing model can be derived from the equilibrium expected return function, which contains a systematic return factor and an ambiguity portfolio return factor, where the ambiguity portfolio weights are determined within the model. We test our model empirically and we obtain the model-implied results.
Smooth ambiguity preferences and asset prices with a jump-diffusion process

Masataka Suzuki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2021.2016922

IF: 1.986

2022-01-13

Quantitative Finance

Abstract:The present study extends the continuous-time smooth ambiguity preferences model by introducing a Poisson jump component into the agent's consumption process. Under this setting, we examine the effect of ambiguity with respect to both Brownian motion and a Poisson jump process on asset prices. Using reasonable values for preferences parameters, our model replicates historical moments of the U.S. asset returns, including the equity premium, equity volatility, and risk-free rate. Our model also generates substantial equity variance premium and a mildly downward sloping volatility curve of equity options that are consistent with the U.S. data. In addition, our model captures the predictive power of the variance premium with respect to equity returns.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,business, finance
Investment Decisions Under Ambiguity: Evidence from Mutual Fund Investor Behavior

C. Wei Li,Ashish Tiwari,Lin Tong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2331486

2013-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We provide novel evidence on the role of ambiguity aversion in determining the response of mutual fund investors to fund performance. Our analysis is motivated by theoretical models of decision making by ambiguity-averse investors. A key implication of the models is that when investors face information signals of uncertain quality, they place a greater weight on the worst signal. We find strong empirical support for this prediction in the form of heightened sensitivity of investor fund flows to the worst performance measure across multiple horizons. This effect is particularly pronounced for retail funds in contrast to institutional funds.
Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums

Simon Dietz,Oliver Walker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12208

2017-03-23

Abstract:Many insurance contracts are contingent on events such as hurricanes, terrorist attacks, or political upheavals, whose probabilities are ambiguous. This article offers a theory to underpin the large body of empirical evidence showing that higher premiums are charged under ambiguity. We model a (re)insurer that maximizes profit subject to a survival constraint that is sensitive to the range of estimates of the probability of ruin, as well as the insurer's attitude toward this ambiguity. We characterize when one book of insurance is more ambiguous than another and general circumstances in which a more ambiguous book requires at least as large a capital holding. We subsequently derive several explicit formulae for the price of insurance contracts under ambiguity, each of which identifies the extra ambiguity load.

economics,business, finance
Asset Pricing and Ambiguity: A Cross-Sectional Approach

Jens Kvaerner,Joakim Kvamvold,Maximilian Rohrer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497580

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We use textual analysis to quantify how familiar investors are with any company’s business model. Our main result is that a portfolio that buys unfamiliar companies and sells familiar companies earns an annual premium of 5.3 %. Further, we find that unfamiliar companies have higher discount rates and lower listing prices in Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) than that of familiar companies. In particular, unfamiliar companies have about 50 % higher one-day returns after the IPO than firms with familiar business models. Overall, our results are consistent with previous empirical evidence on ambiguity premium. The data rejects investor recognition as an alternative explanation.
Ambiguity in asset pricing and portfolio choice: a review of the literature

Massimo Guidolin,Francesca Rinaldi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9343-2

2012-12-07

Theory and Decision

Abstract:We survey the literature that has explored the implications of decision-making under ambiguity for financial market outcomes, such as portfolio choice and equilibrium asset prices. This ambiguity literature has led to a number of significant advances in our ability to rationalize empirical features of asset returns and portfolio decisions, such as the failure of the two-fund separation theorem in portfolio decisions, the modest exposure to risky securities observed for a majority of investors, the home equity preference in international portfolio diversification, the excess volatility of asset returns, the equity premium and the risk-free rate puzzles, and the occurrence of trading break-downs.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods
Ambiguity Aversion, Information Acquisition, And Market Opacity

Junyong He,Helen Hui Huang,Shunming Zhang

2020-01-01

Annals of economics and finance

Abstract:We investigate the effect of ambiguity on asset pricing and aggregate welfare. There are two types of traders, transparent and opaque, in the economy. The transparent traders face ambiguity about standard deviation (variance) of returns for extra investment opportunities when they trade. This ambiguity restraints their investment decisions, may lead to higher equity premium and loss of social welfare, cause the negative effects on market outcomes. Our analysis demonstrates that how the regulations, increasing information acquisition cost and reducing market opacity, affect traders' behavior, asset pricing and social welfare through transparent traders' ambiguity.
Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time

Zengjing Chen,Larry Epstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00337

IF: 6.1

2002-07-01

Econometrica

Abstract:Models of utility in stochastic continuous–time settings typically assume that beliefs are represented by a probability measure, hence ruling out a priori any concern with ambiguity. This paper formulates a continuous–time intertemporal version of multiple–priors utility, where aversion to ambiguity is admissible. In a representative agent asset market setting, the model delivers restrictions on excess returns that admit interpretations reflecting a premium for risk and a separate premium for ambiguity.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,statistics & probability
A simple robust asset pricing model under statistical ambiguity

Luis García-Feijóo,Ariel M. Viale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2021.2020887

IF: 1.986

2022-02-08

Quantitative Finance

Abstract:We derive a simple robust single-factor market model under statistical ambiguity that uses relative entropy as the ambiguity index constraining the multiple priors set. We also discuss theoretically the validity of relative entropy to measure model discrepancy and detect misspecification. The premium on both risk and ambiguity in our model would set a bound on stock prices that investors can use as a ‘margin of safety’ against extreme market events.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,business, finance
Robust Utility Maximization with Extremely Ambiguity-Loving and Ambiguity-Aversion Preferences

Bin Li,Lihe Wang,Dewen Xiong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2017.1371176

2017-01-01

Stochastics

Abstract:In this paper, we investigate the robust utilitymaximization problems under both preferences of extremely ambiguity loving and ambiguity aversion. By a fundamental martingale characterization technique on nonlinear expectations, optimal investment strategies are explicitly solved in a general non- Markovian framework via backward stochastic differential equations. Different with previous works in the literature assuming the convexity of the set of prior probabilitymeasuresQ, our analysis are independent of the cardinality ofQ. Our results show that extremely ambiguity- loving ( resp. - aversion) investors will adopt the extremely aggressive ( resp. conservative) investment strategy.
Equilibrium Investment and Reinsurance Strategies under Smooth Ambiguity with a General Second-Order Distribution

Guohui Guan,Bin Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104515

2022-01-01

Abstract:This paper studies an optimal investment and reinsurance problem under the smooth ambiguity model proposed by Klibanoff et al. (2005). We assume the mean-variance criterion for risk preferences and constant absolute ambiguity aversion for ambiguity preferences. In light of time inconsistency, closed-form equilibrium investment and reinsurance strategies are obtained for a general second-order distribution for financial and insurance risks. This generality provides great flexibility for decision makers to model ambiguity and assigns a diverse array of weights to the set of prior probability measures. To tackle the challenge from a general second-order distribution, we investigate the impact of ambiguity attitudes on the equilibrium strategies analytically by adopting the comparison principle method for the associated differential equations. We find smooth ambiguity can generate richer forms of optimal strategies than other ambiguity models, which highlights the importance and distinction of smooth ambiguity. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Dynamic Portfolio Optimization with Ambiguity Aversion

Jinqing Zhang,Zeyu Jin,Yunbi An

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.03.007

IF: 3.539

2017-01-01

Journal of Banking & Finance

Abstract:This paper investigates portfolio selection in the presence of transaction costs and ambiguity about return predictability. By distinguishing between ambiguity aversion to returns and to return predictors, we derive the optimal dynamic trading rule in closed form within the framework of Garleanu and Pedersen (2013), using the robust optimization method. We characterize its properties and the unique mechanism through which ambiguity aversion impacts the optimal robust strategy. In addition to the two trading principles documented in Garleanu and Pedersen (2013), our model further implies that the robust strategy aims to reduce the expected loss arising from estimation errors. Ambiguity-averse investors trade toward an aim portfolio that gives less weight to highly volatile return-predicting factors, and loads less on the securities that have large and costly positions in the existing portfolio. Using data on various commodity futures, we show that the robust strategy outperforms the corresponding non-robust strategy in out-of-sample tests. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Time-consistent Reinsurance and Investment Strategies for an AAI under Smooth Ambiguity Utility

Guohui Guan,Xiaojun Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2020.1719880

IF: 1.7821

2020-01-01

Scandinavian Actuarial Journal

Abstract:This paper investigates time-consistent reinsurance(excess-of-loss, proportional) and investment strategies for an ambiguity averse insurer(abbr. AAI). The AAI is ambiguous towards the insurance and financial markets. In the AAI's attitude, the intensity of the insurance claims' number and the market price of risk of a stock can not be estimated accurately. This formulation of ambiguity is similar to the uncertainty of different equivalent probability measures. The AAI can purchase excess-of-loss or proportional reinsurance to hedge the insurance risk and invest in a financial market with cash and an ambiguous stock. We investigate the optimization goal under smooth ambiguity given in Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., & Mukerji, S. [(2005). A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73, 1849-1892], which aims to search the optimal strategies under average case. The utility function does not satisfy the Bellman's principle and we employ the extended HJB equation proposed in Bjork, T. & Murgoci, A. [(2014). A theory of Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control in discrete time. Finance and Stochastics 18(3), 545-592] to solve this problem. In the end of this paper, we derive the equilibrium reinsurance and investment strategies under smooth ambiguity and present the sensitivity analysis to show the AAI's economic behaviors.

On Identification of Ambiguity Premium

Implied Ambiguity: Mean-Variance Inefficiency and Pricing Errors

Ambiguity, Learning, And Asset Returns

Return Ambiguity, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing

Does Smooth Ambiguity Matter for Asset Pricing?

A Continuous-Time Asset Pricing Model with Smooth Ambiguity Preferences

Ambiguity Aversion and Variance Premium

Optimal Investment and Premium Control for Insurers with Ambiguity

Ambiguity Aversion and Asset Price Dynamics

Smooth ambiguity preferences and asset prices with a jump-diffusion process

Investment Decisions Under Ambiguity: Evidence from Mutual Fund Investor Behavior

Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums

Asset Pricing and Ambiguity: A Cross-Sectional Approach

Ambiguity in asset pricing and portfolio choice: a review of the literature

Ambiguity Aversion, Information Acquisition, And Market Opacity

Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time

A simple robust asset pricing model under statistical ambiguity

Robust Utility Maximization with Extremely Ambiguity-Loving and Ambiguity-Aversion Preferences

Equilibrium Investment and Reinsurance Strategies under Smooth Ambiguity with a General Second-Order Distribution

Dynamic Portfolio Optimization with Ambiguity Aversion

Time-consistent Reinsurance and Investment Strategies for an AAI under Smooth Ambiguity Utility