Combining 5‐azacitidine with the E‐selectin antagonist uproleselan is an effective strategy to augment responses in myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukaemia

Anoop K. Enjeti,William E. Fogler,Theodore A. G. Smith,Lisa F. Lincz,Danielle R. Bond,John L. Magnani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19466
2024-04-26
British Journal of Haematology
Abstract:The interaction of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) blasts with the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is a major determinant governing disease progression and resistance to treatment. Despite the success of hypomethylating agent (HMA)‐containing regimens in older AML patients, the development of primary or secondary resistance is common. The constitutive expression of E‐selectin in the vascular compartment and the mesenchymal cells directly mediates chemoresistance via E‐selectin ligand/receptors. We demonstrate that following treatment with 5‐azacitidine, promoter regions regulating the E‐selectin ligands become further hypomethylated. Our models show that the resultant upregulation of these gene products likely causes functional E‐selectin binding. When combined with the E‐selectin antagonist uproleselan, this adhesion to E‐selectin is reversed. Our collective data from cell lines, mouse models and patient samples provide a strong rationale to evaluate 5‐azacitidine in combination with the E‐selectin antagonist, uproleselan, in this difficult‐to‐treat patient population. Summary The interaction of acute myeloid leukaemic (AML) blasts with the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is a major determinant governing disease progression and resistance to treatment. The constitutive expression of E‐selectin in the vascular compartment of BM, a key endothelial cell factor, directly mediates chemoresistance via E‐selectin ligand/receptors. Despite the success of hypomethylating agent (HMA)‐containing regimens to induce remissions in older AML patients, the development of primary or secondary resistance is common. We report that following treatment with 5‐azacitidine, promoter regions regulating the biosynthesis of the E‐selectin ligands, sialyl Lewis X, become further hypomethylated. The resultant upregulation of these gene products, in particular α(1,3)‐fucosyltransferase VII (FUT7) and α(2,3)‐sialyltransferase IV (ST3GAL4), likely causes functional E‐selectin binding. When combined with the E‐selectin antagonist uproleselan, the adhesion to E‐selectin is reversed and the survival of mice transplanted with AML cells is prolonged. Finally, we present clinical evidence showing that BM myeloid cells from higher risk MDS and AML patients have the potential to bind E‐selectin, and these cells are more abundant in 5‐azacitidine‐non‐responsive patients. The collective data provide a strong rationale to evaluate 5‐azacitidine in combination with the E‐selectin antagonist, uproleselan, in this patient population.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?