Abstract:Background: Although multiple professional organizations encourage minimally invasive surgical approaches whenever feasible, nationally, fewer than half of myomectomies are performed via minimally invasive routes. Black women are less likely than their non-Black counterparts to have minimally invasive surgery. Objective: This study aimed to assess the trends in surgical approach among women who underwent minimally invasive myomectomies for uterine leiomyomas within a large integrated healthcare system as initiatives were implemented to encourage minimally invasive surgery, particularly evaluating differences in the proportion of minimally invasive surgery performed in Black vs non-Black women. Study design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women, aged ≥18 years, who underwent a myomectomy for a uterine leiomyoma within Kaiser Permanente Northern California between 2009 and 2019. Generalized estimating equations and Cochran-Armitage testing were used to assess myomectomy incidence and linear trend in the proportions of myomectomy by surgical route-abdominal myomectomy and minimally invasive myomectomy. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations between surgical route and (1) race and ethnicity and (2) complications, controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics. Results: A total of 4033 adult women underwent a myomectomy during the study period. Myomectomy incidence doubled from 0.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.13) per 1000 women in 2009 to 0.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.25) per 1000 women in 2019 (P<.001). During the 11-year study period, the proportion of minimally invasive myomectomy increased from 6.0% to 89.5% (a 15-fold increase). The proportion of minimally invasive myomectomy in Black women remained lower than in non-Black women (54.5% vs 64.7%; P<.001). Black women undergoing myomectomy were younger (36.4±5.6 vs 37.4±5.8 years; P<.001), had a higher mean fibroid weight (436.0±505.0 vs 324.7±346.1 g; P<.001), and had a higher mean body mass index (30.8±7.3 vs 26.6±5.9 kg/m2; P<.001) than their non-Black counterparts. In addition to patient race, surgery performed between 2016 and 2019 compared with surgery performed between 2009 and 2012 and higher surgeon volume compared with low surgeon volume were associated with an increased proportion of minimally invasive myomectomy (adjusted relative risks, 12.58 [95% confidence interval, 9.96-15.90] and 6.63 [95% confidence interval, 5.35-8.21], respectively). Black race and fibroid weight of >500 g each independently conferred lower rates of minimally invasive myomectomy. In addition, there was an interaction between race and fibroid weight such that Black women with a fibroid weight of ≤500 g or >500 g were both less likely to have minimally invasive myomectomy than non-Black women with a fibroid weight of ≤500 g (adjusted relative risks, 0.74 [95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.95] and 0.26 [95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.36], respectively). Operative, perioperative, and medical complications were low during the 11-year study period. In regression analyses, after controlling for race, age, fibroid weight, parity, low-income residence, body mass index, surgeon volume, and year of myomectomy, the risk of complications was not markedly different comparing abdominal myomectomy with minimally invasive myomectomy. Similar results were found comparing laparoscopic minimally invasive myomectomy with robotic-assisted minimally invasive myomectomy except for women who underwent laparoscopic minimally invasive myomectomy had a lower risk of experiencing any medical complications than those who underwent robotic-assisted minimally invasive myomectomy (adjusted relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.83; P=.02). Conclusion: Within an integrated healthcare delivery system, although initiatives to encourage minimally invasive surgery were associated with a marked increase in the proportion of minimally invasive myomectomy, Black women continued to be less likely to undergo minimally invasive myomectomy than their non-Black counterparts. Race and fibroid weight alone did not explain the disparities in minimally invasive myomectomy.

Racial disparities in access to minimally invasive proctectomy for rectal cancer—a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study

Effects of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes in early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-weighted cohort study

Clinical Trial Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

Comparing the outcomes of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in black and white men: Experience of a high-volume center

Racial Disparities in Bowel Preparation and Post-Operative Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Surgical Outcomes and Sociodemographic Disparities Across All Races: An ACS-NSQIP and NHIS Multi-Institutional Analysis of Over 7.5 Million Patients

Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis

Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015)

Recent racial/ethnic disparities in cancer-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with rectal cancer

Minimally invasive myomectomy: practice trends and differences between Black and non-Black women within a large integrated healthcare system

United States-Based Colorectal Cancer Surgical Trials Lack Representation and Adequate Reporting of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Participants: Systematic Review and Regression Analysis

Surgical trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic colostomy reversal for benign disease

Trends in Racial and Ethnic Differences in Declined Surgery for Resectable Malignancies in the United States

A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional open proctectomy for locally advanced colon cancer

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery

Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Vs Open Abdominoperineal Resections for Low Rectal Cancer: Short-term Outcomes of a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Robotic- vs laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for locally advanced rectal cancer based on propensity score matching: Short-term outcomes at a colorectal center in China.

Trends and disparities in access to minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (midp): an eight-year analysis from the national cancer database

Trends and Disparities in Robotic Surgery Utilization for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency General Surgery Outcomes Among Older Adult Patients