Abstract:The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured as premature responses. The 5CSRTT has been adapted for the use in touchscreen operant boxes. We assessed long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this touchscreen task. Mice were trained on the baseline 5CSRTT, then tested using three versions of the task: reduced stimulus duration (SD), variable inter‐trial interval (ITI), and elongated 9 s ITI. We then tested the performance following administration of pharmacological agents known to affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with a 9 s ITI. A reduced SD impacted attention but had no effect on premature responding. Both the variable and 9 s ITI increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using a 9 s ITI. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges. The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured by premature responses. The task has been adapted for mice in touchscreen operant boxes, which is thought to offer improved test–retest reliability. Few studies have assessed the long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this version of the task. We used the touchscreen 5CSRTT to conduct longitudinal testing of stability of premature responding following repeated behavioral and pharmacological manipulations. Male C57BL/6J mice were trained on a baseline version of the 5CSRTT. They were then tested on versions of the task in which the stimulus duration was reduced, and inter‐trial intervals were elongated or varied within‐session. Premature responding was subsequently tested following administration of pharmacological agents known to bi‐directionally affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with elongated inter‐trial intervals. A reduced stimulus duration impacted attention, with reduced accuracy and increased omissions, but had no effect on premature responding. Both elongating and varying the inter‐trial interval within‐session increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding, though less than previously reported in rats. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using an elongated inter‐trial interval. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges.

Knowledge by omission: the significance of omissions in the 5-choice serial reaction time task

The Application of the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task for the Assessment of Visual Attentional Processes and Impulse Control in Rats

The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry

Psychopharmacological Approaches to Modulating Attention in the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: Implications for Schizophrenia

An Open-Source, Fully Customizable 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task Toolbox for Automated Behavioral Training of Rodents

Assessing the stability of responding of male mice in the touchscreen 5 choice serial reaction time task: Focus on premature responding

Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations

Adaptive Aspects of Impulsivity and Interactions with Effects of Catecholaminergic Agents in the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: Implications for ADHD

Differential Roles of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens in Attentional Performance on the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task

Monoamines , Acetylcholine and Contingency of Reward Delivery in Instrumental Behaviour

Selective Deficits in Attentional Performance on the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task Following Pedunculopontine Tegmental Nucleus Lesions.

Double Dissociation of Serotonergic and Dopaminergic Mechanisms on Attentional Performance Using a Rodent Five-Choice Reaction Time Task

Competition and reward structures nearly eliminate time-on-task performance decrements: Implications for theories of vigilance and mental effort.

Upshifted decision criteria in attentional blink and repetition blindness

The Cerebral Cortex of the Rat and Visual Attentional Function: Dissociable Effects of Mediofrontal, Cingulate, Anterior Dorsolateral, and Parietal Cortex Lesions on a Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task

Dissociable aspects of performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task following lesions of the dorsal anterior cingulate, infralimbic and orbitofrontal cortex in the rat: differential effects on selectivity, impulsivity and compulsivity.

Dissociating Reward Sensitivity and Negative Urgency Effects on Impulsivity in the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task.

Reduced attention and the performance of "automated" movements.

Doubly Dissociable Effects of Median- and Dorsal-Raphé Lesions on the Performance of the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Test of Attention in Rats

The 5 choice continuous performance test (5C-CPT): A novel tool to assess cognitive control across species

Mixed Attentional and Executive Deficits in Medial Frontal Cortex Lesioned Rats