The investigational role of cytoreductive stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) to the primary tumor in metastatic kidney cancer

Gianluca Ingrosso,Andrea Lancia,Eleonora Festa,Antonio Rosario Pisani,Rita Bellavita,Cynthia Aristei,Beatrice Detti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2349783
2024-05-03
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
Abstract:KEYWORDS: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents around 3% of all cancers in the world, being the 14 th most common and its incidence is higher in the older population [ Citation 1 ]. It has been estimated that in Europe there will be a 40.5% increase in the incidence in the next 20 years for people older than 75 [ Citation 2 ]. In elderly patients, it is difficult to offer always an invasive therapeutic approach (i.e. radical nephrectomy or thermal ablation) because of advanced age or medical comorbidities, so it may happen to under-treat them in clinical practice [ Citation 3 ]. Moreover, nephrectomy might cause an important renal function decline delaying or impairing systemic therapy. Thus, in recent years great interest has grown in nonsurgical therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) based on the results of several retrospective studies on primary and metastatic RCC [ Citation 4 , Citation 5 ], and these results have led to prospective trials [ Citation 6 , Citation 7 ]. More specifically, SABR has been investigated in a phase II non-randomized trial (Fastrack) for the curative treatment of primary RCC in 70 patients judged unfit for surgery, with excellent oncologic and renal function outcomes [ Citation 6 ]. From the radiobiological point of view, SABR allows high-dose radiation leading to direct neoplastic cell killing, and tumor microenvironment remodeling with caspases-mediated endothelial apoptosis and immune response activation through the expression of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and the production of pro-apoptotic circulating cytokines [ Citation 8 ]. In the metastatic setting, these effects on the tumor microenvironment can be enhanced by Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) which have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of RCC [ Citation 9 , Citation 10 ]. Although concerns have been raised about the efficacy of SABR compared with nephrectomy or thermal ablation based on the presence of viable tumor cells in post-SABR kidney biopsies [ Citation 11 ], recently Hannan et al. demonstrated that cytoreductive SABR is effective for the treatment of primary kidney cancer [ Citation 12 ]. They conducted a phase II trial enrolling 16 patients with biopsy-confirmed RCC (maximum diameter ≤5 cm) who underwent SABR (36 Gy in 3 fractions, or 40 Gy in 5 fractions) with local control (LC) and pathologic evidence of tumor response at 1 year as primary endpoints. LC was obtained in 94% of the patients with pathologic evidence of tumor response, and the median renal function loss 1 year after SABR, assessed as the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was 4.5 ml/min. The most innovative result of the study by Hannan et al. was that post-SABR kidney biopsies demonstrated a significant decrease in cellularity and proliferative state of remaining scant viable tumor cells (reduction of Ki-67 positivity compared with pre-SABR specimens, p = 0.0078). Moreover, there was microenvironment remodeling with increased fibrosis, and dense hyalinization with remaining scant tumor cells expressing p16, a marker for cellular senescence, reflecting a permanently non-replicative state. Therefore, based on clinical and translational data elderly metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients in need of cytoreductive therapy of the primary unfit or refusing surgery might receive SABR because it is a safe and effective noninvasive treatment that triggers the immune response, in such an immunogenic tumor, and can be combined with current systemic options (TKIs and ICIs) without delaying their initiation.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?