Abstract:Context: As future physicians, osteopathic medical students will play a critical role in helping patients make informed decisions regarding treatment options. Objective: To examine the influence that the time, cost, and cosmetic effects associated with treatment options for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), along with students' demographic characteristics, have on treatment decision-making. The influence that different sources of information have on students was also studied. Methods: Medical students were recruited from the Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine for this cross-sectional study. Students were presented with a case scenario in which they were a patient with primary nodular BCC in a low-risk zone, and they were asked to select standard surgical excision (SSE) or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) as a treatment option. They also completed an anonymous survey that assessed the way that factors associated with the treatment options (time, cost, and cosmetic effects) influenced their treatment choice, along with the influence that different sources of information have. Measures of central tendency, frequencies, and other descriptive analyses were used to define the characteristics of the sample. χ2 analysis, correlational analysis, and t tests were used to examine the associations between the treatment decision, treatment-related factors (time, cost, cosmetics), and year in medical school. Statistical significance was set at P≤.05. Results: A total of 450 students completed the survey and were included in the bivariate analysis. Three hundred forty-five students (76.7%) selected MMS as a treatment option and 105 (23.3%) selected SSE. Significant differences were found in the influence of time, cost, and cosmetic effects associated with treatment between students who selected MMS and those who selected SSE (P<.001). Cost played a more influential role in treatment decision-making for students who selected SSE than for those who selected MMS. Time and cosmetic effects played a more influential role in treatment choice for those who selected MMS. The most influential sources of information were health care professionals and medical literature, with 398 (88.4%) and 313 (69.6%) students, respectively, indicating that these sources were highly influential when making medical treatment decisions. The internet had a low influence over students' treatment decision-making (238 [52.9%]). Conclusions: This study represents an initial step toward understanding factors that influence patients' treatment decision-making in a situation in which there is no medically preferred treatment option. The findings point to the importance of time, cost, and cosmetics as influential factors for patients choosing between different treatment options.

DS18 Pre-Mohs biopsy survey (related specifically to basal cell carcinoma and biopsy prior to Mohs surgery)

Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Brief Overview

Using optical coherence tomography to optimize Mohs micrographic surgery

Surgical Margins of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers in Mohs Surgery: Dermoscopy Versus Naked Eye

A review of Mohs micrographic surgery for skin cancer. Part 1: Melanoma and rare skin cancers

Diagnostic accuracy of autofluorescence-Raman microspectroscopy for surgical margin assessment during Mohs micrographic surgery of basal cell carcinoma

Mohs micrographic technique in high-risk basal cell carcinoma: a 3D prediction of safety margins

Clinical Impact and Accuracy of Shave Biopsy for Initial Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma

Removal of Incidental Skin Cancer During Mohs Micrographic Surgery Indicated for a Different Primary Tumor

Factors associated with residual tumor at time of Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas

Using Initial Biopsies and Vertical Sections to Improve Trainees' Confidence in Performing Mohs Surgery

Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study

Clinical Versus Histologic Margins for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparing Outcomes for High-Risk Tumors Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery

A systematic review of the incidence of basal cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: conventional pathology versus Mohs micrographic surgery

Retrospective Study of Punch Scoring Versus Freehand Approach for First Stage Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Mohs Micrographic Surgery in the Surgical Treatment Paradigm of Melanoma In Situ and Invasive Melanoma: A Clinical Review of Treatment Efficacy and Ongoing Controversies

Previous therapy and the recurrence rate of basal cell carcinoma after Mohs surgery: a meta-analysis

Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Surgery Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery for the Treatment of Difficult-to-treat Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Retrospective Clinical Study.

Intraoperative Immunohistochemistry During Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Staged Excision Decreases Local Recurrence Rates for Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Medical Student Decision-Making: Standard Surgical Excision or Mohs Micrographic Surgery to Manage Basal Cell Carcinoma

Factors Influencing Margin Clearance and the Number of Stages of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Chart Review