Adaptation of an ECMO team in the era of successful alternative therapies for neonatal pulmonary failure

G M Haase,J M Kennaugh,D R Clarke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(95)90688-6
Abstract:Neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension show severe hypoxemia that requires a variety of therapeutic modalities. When patients do not respond to conventional medical management that includes hyperventilation, inotropic support, and vasodilating agents, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be used. More recently, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and nitric oxide inhalation have been used in these infants and have impacted the need for ECMO. In light of these changes in therapy, the authors reviewed the 6-year clinical experience of an ECMO team to assess trends in patient population and outcome and document adaptation of the medical professionals to a new treatment era. Between 1988 and 1993, 88 neonates who met the institutional criteria were placed on venoarterial ECMO. Oscillatory ventilation was locally introduced in 1991 and nitric oxide treatment in 1992. Patient outcomes for the 1988 to 1990 period were compared with those for 1991 to 1993. Analyses included indication for ECMO therapy, length and complexity of the run, length of hospital stay, and cost of patient care. During the first 3 years, 65 patients were placed on ECMO, compared with 23 patients during the 3 years after introduction of oscillatory ventilation and nitric oxide therapy (P < .001). The length of ECMO therapy increased from a mean of 128 hours to 190 hours (P = .005), and the average hospital stay, likewise, increased from 27 days to 42 days. The total cost of care increased by approximately $40,000 per patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?