Abstract:Research in the domain of 'Innovation Studies' has been claimed to allow for the study of how technology will develop in the future. Some suggest that the National and Sectoral Innovation Systems literature has become bogged down, however, into case studies of how specific institutions affect innovation in a specific country. A useful notion for policy makers in particular, Balzat & Hanusch (2004) argued that there is a need for NIS studies to develop complementary and also quantitative methods in order to generate new insights that are comparable across national borders. We use data for patents granted by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to map innovation systems. Groupings of patents into primary and secondary classes (co-classification) can be used as relational indicators. Knowledge from one class may be more easily used in another class when a co-classification relation exists. Using social network analysis, we map the co-classification of patents among classes and thus indicate what characterizes an innovation system. A main contribution of this paper is methodological, adding to the repertoire of methods NIS studies use and using information from patents in a different way. Policy makers may also find benefits in the social network analysis of the complete set of patents granted by the WIPO to firms and individuals in a country. Social network analysis indicates what innovation activity occurs in a countries and which fields of technology are likely to give rise to innovative products in the near future. We offer such analysis for the Dutch and Indian Innovation Systems. This social network analysis could also be done for a Sector Innovation System, and we do so for Nanotech to determine empirically the knowledge field relevant for this emerging scientific domain.

The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies

National Systems of Innovation , the Triple Helix : Can the KnowledgeBase of an Economy be Measured ?

return Can the KnowledgeBase of an Economy Be Measured ? 1 *

Communication and Knowledge: How is the knowledge base of an economy constructed?

Technology Transfer and the End of the Bayh-Dole Effect: Patents as an Analytical Lens on University-Industry-Government Relations

The Mutual Information of University-Industry-Government Relations: An Indicator of the Triple Helix Dynamics

The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems

The Decline of University Patenting and the End of the Bayh–Dole Effect

The Triple Helix Model and the study of Knowledge Based Inovation Systems

Innovation Systems As Patent Networks: the Netherlands, India and Nanotech

The Globalization of Academic Entrepreneurship? The Recent Growth (2009-2014) in University Patenting Decomposed

Patent Portfolio Analysis of Cities: Statistics and Maps of Technological Inventiveness

The Relation Between University Science Base and Follow-Up Patent Activity

Eco-system Mapping of Techno-Science Linkages at the Level of Scholarly Journals and Fields.

Knowledge flows between universities and industry: the impact of distance, technological compatibility, and the ability to diffuse knowledge

An analysis of the evolution of science-technology linkage in biomedicine

Looking Back to Move Forward: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaboration

Developmental tendencies in the Academic Field of Intellectual Property through the Identification of Invisible Colleges

Publication Activity, Citation Impact and Bi-Directional Links Between Publications and Patents in Biotechnology

Globalization And Growth Of Us University Patenting (2009-2014)

Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis