Abstract:Purpose of review: The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. Recent findings: Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.

Which is the best approach for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions? The one you feel most confident with!

Retrograde Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Right Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Via Left Internal Mammary Artery Graft

Performance of the minimalistic hybrid approach algorithm versus other conventional algorithms in the percutaneous treatment of chronic total occlusions

The Retrograde Recanalization of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: Approaching Through the Backdoor

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Multivessel Disease: The Ideal Strategy for Challenging Scenarios

A step-by-step guide to mastering retrograde coronary chronic total occlusion intervention in 2018: The author's perspective

Combined antegrade and retrograde dissection and re‐entry techniques: A two‐in‐one chronic total occlusion procedure

Mini-STAR as bail-out strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion

Transcatheter recanalization of chronic total occlusion in congenital heart disease: case reports and lessons from percutaneous coronary interventions

A contemporary review of clinical significances of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions, with some Japanese insights

The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Role of CT Coronary Angiography in Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion

Sub-Intimal Tracking and Re-Entry and Investment Procedures: Current Applications and Future Directions

Outcomes of contemporary versus conventional reverse controlled and antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking in chronic total occlusion revascularization

Updated Strategies in Non-Culprit Stenosis Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease-A Contemporary Review

Comparison between tip-detection method and retrograde approach for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

Non-invasive imaging to guide percutaneous coronary revascularization in chronic total occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

When, Who and How?

Patient Selection and Clinical Indication for Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization-A Workflow Focusing on Non-Invasive Cardiac Imaging

Resurrecting an Old Concept in Contemporary Practice

Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention?