P936 Ultrasound Transmural Remission in Crohn's disease: Different Rate between First and Second Line of Biological Therapy

R De Sire,A Rispo,A Caiazzo,N Cantisani,G Calabrese,A Guarino,A Testa,O M Nardone,F Castiglione
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.1066
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Ultrasound transmural remission in Crohn’s disease (CD) has been associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes including reduced hospitalization, surgery, escalation of treatment, and a decrease in clinical relapse over endoscopic remission alone. Albeit transmural remission rate (TRR) in CD patients treated with anti-TNF drugs in first line has been well explored, data on TRR using vedolizumab (VDZ) or ustekinumab (UST) as second-line therapy for CD are still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the TRR in CD patients in maintenance treatment, comparing adalimumab (ADA) in first line with VDZ/UST in second line. Methods From 2018 to 2022 we performed a real world observational longitudinal study evaluating the TRR in all consecutive CD patients in a 2-years maintenance treatment with ADA in first line compared with those treated by VDZ or UST in second line. HBI, fecal calprotectin (FC), SES-CD, and bowel wall thickness (BWT) at ultrasound were analyzed in all patients at the baseline (T0) and after 2 years of maintenance treatment (T1). Clinical remission was defined when HBI was <4. Endoscopic remission was defined when SES-CD was <2. Transmural remission was defined when BWT was <3 mm at a "per-patient" analysis. In accordance with recent literature, laboratory remission was defined when FC was <94 ug/gr. Results One hundred and sixty-one CD patients (78 ADA, 41 VDZ, 42 UST) were included in the study. At T1, TRR was recorded in 39.7% of CD patients treated in first line with ADA, and in 17.1% and 21.4% for VDZ and UST, respectively, in second line (ADA vs VDZ/UST: p<0.05; VDZ vs UST: p 0.6). Endoscopic remission rate was 50% for patients treated in first line with ADA, and 31.7% and 35.7% for second line VDZ and UST, respectively (ADA vs VDZ/UST: p<0.05; VDZ vs UST: p 0.7). Laboratory remission rate was 53.8% for patients treated in first line with ADA, and 29.3% and 35.7% for VDZ and UST in second line, respectively (ADA vs VDZ/UST: p<0.05; VDZ vs UST: p=0.5). Clinical remission rate was 58.9% for patients treated in first line with ADA, and 43.9% and 47.6% for second line VDZ and UST, respectively (ADA vs VDZ/UST: p=0.09; VDZ vs UST: p=0.2). Conclusion Our findings showed that in CD patients in maintenance treatment with biologics, ADA in first line showed a higher TRR compared with VDZ/UST in second line. Moreover, VDZ and UST showed similar TRR and other outcomes when used in second line.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the transmural remission rate (TRR) of Crohn's disease (CD) patients when treated with different biologics during maintenance therapy. Specifically, the study compared the transmural remission rates of adalimumab (ADA) used in the first - line treatment with vedolizumab (VDZ) or ustekinumab (UST) used in the second - line treatment, as well as other clinical indicators such as endoscopic remission rate, laboratory remission rate and clinical remission rate. The research background indicates that transmural remission is associated with improved long - term clinical outcomes, including reduced hospitalization, surgery, treatment escalation and decreased clinical recurrence rate. Although there have been many studies on the transmural remission rate of anti - TNF drugs (such as adalimumab) used in the first - line treatment, the data on the transmural remission rate of vedolizumab or ustekinumab as second - line treatment are still relatively limited. Therefore, this study aims to fill this knowledge gap and provide more basis for clinical decision - making.