Residual force depression is not related to positive muscle fascicle work during submaximal voluntary dorsiflexion contractions in humans

Brent James Raiteri,Leon Lauret,Daniel Hahn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp285703
2024-02-23
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend Accurately predicting muscle force is challenging because active muscle shortening depresses force output. We explored whether the residual force depression (rFD) following active shortening could be predicted by fascicle work. Once the optimal angle of active torque production was determined, we reduced tibialis anterior muscle fascicle shortening during EMG‐amplitude‐matched contractions through muscle–tendon unit (MTU) lengthening (LEN) over small and medium amplitudes without a preload. We also increased fascicle shortening through MTU LEN with a preload over a large amplitude (not shown), and through MTU shortening (SHO) over small and large amplitudes without (not shown) and with a preload. Relative to fixed‐end reference (REF) contractions at similar EMG amplitudes and fascicle lengths, MTU LEN reduced fascicle shortening and enhanced steady‐state active dorsiflexion torque. However, increased fascicle shortening during MTU SHO with a preload depressed steady‐state output, whereas MTU SHO without a preload did not depress steady‐state output relative to REF. Consequently, active fascicle shortening induced rFD, but rFD was not well predicted by fascicle work. Residual force depression (rFD) following active muscle shortening is assumed to correlate most strongly with muscle work, but this has not been tested during voluntary contractions in humans. Using dynamometry, we compared steady‐state ankle joint torques (N = 16) following tibialis anterior (TA) muscle–tendon unit (MTU) lengthening and shortening to the time‐matched torque during submaximal voluntary fixed‐end dorsiflexion reference contractions (REF) at a matched MTU length and EMG amplitude. Ultrasound revealed significantly reduced (P
neurosciences,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?