Lesion monitoring parameters as predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation in persistent AF: A DECAAF II sub‐analysis

Mario Mekhael,Han Feng,Hadi Younes,Nour Chouman,Ala Assaf,Chanho Lim,Chao Huang,Eoin Donnellan,Swati Rao,Nassir Marrouche,Omar Kreidieh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16438
IF: 2.7
2024-10-16
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Background The formation of transmural lesions is necessary for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (prAF). Ablation index (AI) and generator impedance drop (ID) predict lesion size but their correlation with long‐term outcomes in prAF is not known. Furthermore, we proposed a new parameter, efficacy ratio (ER) calculated as ID/AI, to gain indirect insight into the role of factors affecting ID but not considered by AI. Methods We included ablations performed during the DECAAF II trial if they had uploaded lesion‐by‐lesion summary data and were performed with radiofrequency catheters on the CARTO system. Average patient‐level parameters were calculated from all generated Vizitags. Results A total of 427 ablations met inclusion criteria and 166 utilized AI. Analyzed as continuous variables, ID and ER predicted long‐term arrhythmia‐free survival but not AI. The ideal cut‐off for ID was ID ≥ 10.4 ohms and had a C‐index of 0.55. It predicted reduced risk of arrhythmia: hazard ratio 0.56 [0.36–0.88], p = .013 (arrhythmia‐free survival of 67% vs. 52%). Similarly, an ER of 1.7 ohms/100AI had a C‐index of 0.58 and predicted reduced arrhythmia recurrence: HR 0.39 [0.22–0.69], p = .001. ER
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?