COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ERGOSPYROMETRIC VARIABLES BETWEEN SEDENTARY AND NON-SEDENTARY PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC SYNDROME AND ESTABLISHED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Roberto Ingaramo,Maria Florencia Lencinas,Miriam Priscila Herrera,Tony Pilco Chavarrea,Andrea Bello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001022360.48259.68
IF: 4.9
2024-05-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the ergospirometric prognostic variables of VO2MAX, OUES, SLOPE VE/VCO2, and ventilatory class, between sedentary and non-sedentary patients with metabolic syndrome all suffering from any kind of established cardiovascular disease. Design and method: From November 2022 to September 2023, 99 patients, with an average age of 70 years, 51.5% women and 48.5% men, underwent an ergospirometry study. They were divided into two groups: sedentary (SP) and non-sedentary (NSP) according to the responses obtained from the IPAQ survey. Subsequently, the ergospirometric variables that measure cardiorespiratory and cardiovascular capacity related to maximum exercise capacity O2 metabolism (VO2MAX), the increase in oxygen consumption according to minute ventilation (OUES) and the response to ventilation according to CO2 production (slope VE/VCO2) were analyzed in both groups. For statistical analysis, the Student's t test and the Fisher exact test were used. The R v4.0.3 software was used. Results: The level of exercise was low in 56 (56.6%) and moderate or high in 43 patients. (43.4%). The NSP group presented higher levels of maximum oxygen consumption (18.3 vs 12.7, p=0.001), higher mean percentage of OUES (92 vs 63.9, p=0.001) and lower mean VE/VCO2 SLOPE ratio (26 vs 31, p=0.001). Among the NSP, 14% were found in ventilatory class 2 and 86% in class 3 and in the SP, 25% were found in class 1, 21.4% in class 2, and 48.2% in class 3. Although that a high percentage of NSP were in functional class 3 (86%) the same presented better values than those SP with better ventilatory class. We did not obtain statistical differences between both groups with respect to their underlying cardiovascular pathologies. Conclusions: A sedentary lifestyle is associated with higher erogospirometric variables risk in patients with metabolic syndrome and established cardiovascular disease. The level of physical activity is a factor that modifies this cardiovascular risk. Ergospirometry is an effective tool to measure cardiovascular prognosis.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?