Menstrual cycle phase does not influence muscle protein synthesis or whole‐body myofibrillar proteolysis in response to resistance exercise

Lauren M. Colenso‐Semple,James McKendry,Changhyun Lim,Philip J. Atherton,Daniel J. Wilkinson,K. Smith,Stuart M. Phillips

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp287342

2024-12-05

The Journal of Physiology

Abstract:figure legend In this study, we used best‐practice methodology to establish menstrual cycle phases of women. We used stable isotope methodologies to assess muscle protein synthesis (MPS) in the mid‐follicular and mid‐luteal phases of their menstrual cycles. One leg performed two bouts of resistance exercise with the contralateral rested leg acting as a control; this was reversed in the opposite menstrual cycle phase. We also assessed whole‐body protein myofibrillar protein breakdown (MPB). We saw, as expected, that resistance exercise stimulated MPS but that there was no effect of menstrual cycle phase on the MPS or MPB responses. There appears to be no anabolic 'advantage' to performing resistance exercise in any particular phase of a woman's menstrual cycle. It has been hypothesised that skeletal muscle protein turnover is affected by menstrual cycle phase with a more anabolic environment during the follicular vs. the luteal phase. We assessed the influence of menstrual cycle phase on muscle protein synthesis and myofibrillar protein breakdown in response to 6 days of controlled resistance exercise in young females during peak oestrogen and peak progesterone, using stable isotopes, unbiased metabolomics and muscle biopsies. We used comprehensive menstrual cycle phase‐detection methods, including cycle tracking, blood samples and urinary test kits, to classify menstrual phases. Participants (n = 12) completed two 6 day study phases in a randomised order: late follicular phase and mid‐luteal phase. Participants performed unilateral resistance exercise in each menstrual cycle phase, exercising the contralateral leg in each phase in a counterbalanced manner. Follicular phase myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) rates were 1.33 ± 0.27% h−1 in the control leg and 1.52 ± 0.27% h−1 in the exercise leg. Luteal phase MPS was 1.28 ± 0.27% h−1 in the control leg and 1.46 ± 0.25% h−1 in the exercise leg. We observed a significant effect of exercise (P

neurosciences,physiology