Abstract:Background and Objectives: Stacked proportional bar graphs (nicknamed Grotta bars) are commonly used to visualize functional outcome scales in stroke research and are also used in other domains of neurological research. In observational studies that present adjusted effect estimates, Grotta bars can mislead readers if they show unadjusted, confounded comparisons. In a sample of recent observational neurology studies with confounding-adjusted effect estimates, we aimed to determine the frequency with which Grotta bars were used to visualize functional outcomes and how often unadjusted Grotta bars were presented without an accompanying adjusted version. We also assessed the methods used to generate adjusted Grotta bars. Methods: In this meta-research study, we systematically examined all observational studies published in the top 15 Clinical Neurology journals between 2020-2021 with an ordinal functional outcome and confounding-adjusted effect estimate. We determined whether at least one comparison using Grotta bars was present, whether the visualized comparisons were adjusted, and which adjustment strategies were applied to generate these graphs. Results: 250 studies met all inclusion criteria. Of these, 93 (37.2%) used Grotta bars to depict functional outcome scale distributions, with 73 (81.7%) presenting only Grotta bars without model-based adjustment. Amongst the 17 studies that presented Grotta bars adjusted using a model, the adjustment strategies included propensity score matching (n=10; 58.8%), regression (n=6; 35.3%), and inverse probability weighting (n=1; 5.9%). Most studies with Grotta bars (n=87; 87.9%) were stroke studies. Discussion: Grotta bars were most often used in stroke research within our sample. Papers that present adjusted associations for functional outcomes commonly showed only unadjusted Grotta bars, which alone may be misleading for causal questions. In observational research, Grotta bars are most informative if an adjusted version, aligning with adjusted effect estimates, is presented directly alongside the unadjusted version. Based on our findings, we offer recommendations to help authors generate informative Grotta bars and facilitate correct interpretation for readers.

Labelling without the Hassle: How to Produce Labeled Stacked Bar Charts Using SGPLOT and GTL Without Annotate

Designing of Gini-chart for Exponential, T, Logistic and Laplace Distributions.

STRUCTURE PLOT: a program for drawing elegant STRUCTURE bar plots in user friendly interface

A Simple Descriptive Method & Standard for Comparing Pairs of Stacked Bar Graphs

Use of stacked proportional bar graphs (`Grotta bars`) to visualize functional outcome distributions in observational neurology research

scatterbar: an R package for visualizing proportional data across spatially resolved coordinates

Legible Label Layout for Data Visualization, Algorithm and Integration into Vega-Lite

The Arrangement of Marks Impacts Afforded Messages: Ordering, Partitioning, Spacing, and Coloring in Bar Charts

How Aligned are Human Chart Takeaways and LLM Predictions? A Case Study on Bar Charts with Varying Layouts

Graphical Overlays: Using Layered Elements to Aid Chart Reading

Two graphs walk into a bar: Readout-based measurement reveals the Bar-Tip Limit error, a common, categorical misinterpretation of mean bar graphs

smplot: An R Package for Easy and Elegant Data Visualization

GenPlot: Increasing the Scale and Diversity of Chart Derendering Data

Gatherplots: Generalized Scatterplots for Nominal Data

ggplot2

Raw Data Visualization for Common Factorial Designs Using SPSS: A Syntax Collection and Tutorial

Use ggbreak to Effectively Utilize Plotting Space to Deal With Large Datasets and Outliers

Teaching and Learning Data Visualization: Ideas and Assignments

Understanding and Automating Graphical Annotations on Animated Scatterplots

Gatherplot: A Non-Overlapping Scatterplot

Taggle: Combining Overview and Details in Tabular Data Visualizations