Comparative assessment of algaecide performance on freshwater phytoplankton: understanding differential sensitivities to frame cyanobacteria management

Malihe Mehdizadeh Allaf,Kevin J. Erratt,Hassan Peerhossaini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119811
IF: 12.8
2023-03-06
Water Research
Abstract:Cyanobacteria represent a growing threat to global water security. With fast proliferation, they raise great concern due to potential health threats and socioeconomic impairment. Algaecides are commonly employed as a mitigative measure to suppress and manage cyanobacteria. However, recent research on algaecides has a limited phycological focus. It has predominately concentrated on cyanobacteria and chlorophytes and has generalized the results to other microorganisms without considering their phycological diversity. To limit the collateral impacts of algaecide interventions on phytoplankton communities it is therefore critical to understand differential sensitivities for establishing optimal dosage and tolerance thresholds for different phycological divisions. This research attempts to fill this knowledge gap and provide efficient guidelines to frame cyanobacterial management. We investigate the effect of two common algaecides, copper sulfate (CuSO 4 ) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), on four major phycological groups (chlorophytes, cyanobacteria, diatoms, and mixotrophs). All phycological divisions exhibited greater sensitivity to copper sulfate, except chlorophytes. Mixotrophs and cyanobacteria displayed the highest sensitivity to both algaecides with the highest to lowest sensitivity being observed as follows: mixotrophs, cyanobacteria, diatoms, and chlorophytes. Our results suggest that H 2 O 2 represents a comparable alternative to CuSO 4 for cyanobacterial control. However, some eukaryotic divisions such as mixotrophs and diatoms mirrored cyanobacteria sensitivity, challenging the assumption that H 2 O 2 is a selective cyanocide. Our findings suggest that optimizing algaecide to suppress cyanobacteria while minimizing potential adverse effects on other phycological members is unattainable. An apparent trade-off between effective cyanobacteria management and conserving non-targeted phycological divisions is expected and should be a prime consideration of lake management.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?