Abstract:The current contents of visual working memory can be disrupted by previously formed memories. This phenomenon is known as proactive interference, and it can be used to index the availability of old memories. However, there is uncertainty about the robustness and lifetime of proactive interference, which raises important questions about the role of temporal factors in forgetting. The present study assessed different factors that were expected to influence the persistence of proactive interference over an inter-trial interval in the visual recent probes task. In three experiments, participants encoded arrays of targets and then determined whether a single probe matched one of those targets. On some trials, the probe matched an item from the previous trial (a "recent negative"), whereas on other trials the probe matched a more distant item (a "non-recent negative"). Prior studies have found that recent negative probes can increase errors and slow response times in comparison to non-recent negative probes, and this offered a behavioral measure of proactive interference. In Experiment 1, factors of array size (the number of targets to be encoded) and inter-trial interval (300 ms vs. 8 s) were manipulated in the recent probes task. There was a reduction in proactive interference when a longer delay separated trials on one measure, but only when participants encoded two targets. When working memory capacity was strained by increasing the array size to four targets, proactive interference became stronger after the long delay. In Experiment 2, the inter-trial interval length was again manipulated, along with stimulus novelty (the number of stimuli used in the experiment). Proactive interference was modestly stronger when a smaller number of stimuli were used throughout the experiment, but proactive interference was minimally affected by the inter-trial interval. These findings are problematic for temporal models of forgetting, but Experiment 3 showed that proactive interference also resisted disruption produced by a secondary task presented within the inter-trial interval. Proactive interference was constantly present and generally resilient to the different manipulations. The combined data suggest a relatively durable, passive representation that can disrupt current working memory under a variety of different circumstances.

Transient susceptibility to interference at event boundaries impacts long-term memory of naturalistic episodes

Behavioural interference at event boundaries reduces long-term memory performance in the virtual water maze task without affecting working memory performance

Rapid Memory Reactivation at Movie Event Boundaries Promotes Episodic Encoding

Visual event boundaries trigger forgetting despite active maintenance in visual working memory

Selectively Interfering With Intrusive but Not Voluntary Memories of a Trauma Film: Accounting for the Role of Associative Memory

When Shorter Delays Lead to Worse Memories: Task Disruption Makes Visual Working Memory Temporarily Vulnerable to Test Interference

Event Segmentation Promotes the Reorganization of Emotional Memory

They saw a movie: Long-term memory for an extended audiovisual narrative

Here it comes: Active forgetting triggered even just by anticipation of an impending event boundary

Reconstructive nature of temporal memory for movie scenes

Long-term memory for movie details: selective decay for verbal information at one week

Slipping through the cracks: The peril of unexpected interruption on the contents of working memory.

Changes in Events Alter How People Remember Recent Information

Time after Time: Preserving Temporal Memories When Experiences Repeat

Tracking Proactive Interference in Visual Memory

Emotional arousal lingers in time to bind discrete episodes in memory

The Hippocampal Film Editor: Sensitivity and Specificity to Event Boundaries in Continuous Experience

Time manages interference in visual short-term memory

Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Evidence for Disrupted Event Segmentation during Continuous Memory Encoding Due to Short Video Watching

Retaining Event Files in Working Memory Requires Extra Object-Based Attention Than the Constituent Elements.

The contribution of disengagement to temporal discriminability