Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Universality of deep convolutional neural networks

Advances in Convolutional Neural Networks

Universal Consistency of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Dynamic Universal Approximation Theory: The Basic Theory for Deep Learning-Based Computer Vision Models

Approximation Analysis of Convolutional Neural Networks

Disentangling Trainability and Generalization in Deep Neural Networks

What can be learnt with wide convolutional neural networks? *

On the universality of neural encodings in CNNs

Theoretical Issues in Deep Networks: Approximation, Optimization and Generalization

Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization

Going Deeper, Generalizing Better: an Information-Theoretic View for Deep Learning.

Theoretical Analysis of Inductive Biases in Deep Convolutional Networks

Approximation analysis of CNNs from a feature extraction view

Deep Network Approximation: Achieving Arbitrary Accuracy with Fixed Number of Neurons

New advances in universal approximation with neural networks of minimal width

Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization

Universal Approximation Property of Hamiltonian Deep Neural Networks

A note about why deep learning is deep: A discontinuous approximation perspective

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

Convolutional Neural Network and its Applications in Artificial Intelligence

Designing Universally-Approximating Deep Neural Networks: A First-Order Optimization Approach