GNSS-IR Snow Depth Retrieval Based on the Fusion of Multi-Satellite SNR Data by the BP Neural Network
Junyu Zhan,Rui Zhang,Jinsheng Tu,Jichao Lv,Xin Bao,Lingxiao Xie,Song Li,Runqing Zhan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061395
IF: 5
2022-03-14
Remote Sensing
Abstract:Compared with previous snow depth monitoring methods, global navigation satellite system-interferometric reflectometry (GNSS-IR) technology has the advantage of obtaining continuous daily observation data, and has great application potential. However, since GNSS satellites are in motion, their position in the sky is constantly varying, and the Fresnel reflection areas about the receiver in different periods alter accordingly. As a result, the retrieving results obtained from different GNSS satellites, and data sets collected in different periods, fluctuate considerably, making the traditional single-satellite-based GNSS-IR retrieving method have limitations in accuracy and reliability. Therefore, this paper proposed a novel GNSS-IR signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) retrieving snow depth method for fusing the available GNSS-IR observations to obtain an accurate and reliable result. We established the retrieval model based on the backpropagation algorithm, which makes full use of the back propagation (BP) neural network’s self-learning and self-adaptive capability to exploit the degree of contribution of different satellites to the final results. Then, the SNR observations of the global positioning system (GPS) L1 carrier from the Plate Boundary Observation (PBO) site P351 were collected to experiment for validation purposes. For all available GPS L1 carrier data, the snow depth values retrieved for each satellite were first obtained by the existing single-satellite-based GNSS-IR retrieval method. Then, four groups of comparison results were acquired, based on the multiple linear regression model, random forest model, mean fusion model, and the proposed BP neural network model, respectively. Taking the snow depth in-situ data provided by snow telemetry (SNOTEL) as a reference, the root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of the proposed solution are 0.0297 m and 0.0219 m, respectively. Furthermore, the retrieving results are highly consistent with the measured data, and the correlation coefficient is 0.9407.
environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary