Abstract:The analysis of morphology is crucial to the study of phylogeny in many ancient and modern organismal groups. Recently a number of arguments have been made in favor of regarding certain kinds of morphometric variables as putatively homologous characters and allowing them to participate, along with other non-morphometric variables, in parsimony-based cladistic analyses. These arguments rest on the assumptions that geometric landmarks incorporate the concept of biological homology and that partial warp and principal warp morphometric variables uniquely incorporate and operationalize the concept of spatial localization, thus providing investigators with the ability to assess patterns and directions of geometrical variation in unmeasured regions of organic forms. Literature review, coupled with empirical investigations of similarities and differences among three different morphometric data analysis methods on two different datasets suggest that there is no support for these assertions. Geometric landmarks, which form the basis for all morphometric measurements and latent shape variables, have no necessary correspondence to biological homology. Partial warp variables, coordinate-point eigenshape variables, and inter-landmark distance-based singular vector shape-change variables all express localized (= regionally-weighted) geometric deformations. However, none of these deformation patterns are localized in the sense of being truly independent from globally-distributed aspects of shape change. All three of the morphometric data analysis methods investigated are capable of inferring patterns of shape change in remote regions of the form so long as a spatially adequate array of landmarks is used as the basis for the shape analysis. Based on these results it is concluded that: (1) all types of morphometric procedures are potentially useful in phylogenetic inference to the extent that they are able to summarize patterns of biotic shape change within the Euclidean space of the original measurements; (2) morphometric interpretations are strengthened by using alternative analytic approaches to probe the geometric system in a hypothetico-deductive manner and achieve a robust and consistent interpretation of underlying differences among operational taxonomic units (OTU s); and (3) while deformation- based morphometric variables can be used to analyze the distribution of organic shapes in a variety of measurement and latent variable spaces, they represent abstract investigative tools that are tied irreducibly to particular samples and data. Such variables can be used to study morphological characters, refine character and character state definitions, and aid in the assignment of character states to OTU s. However, they are not characters themselves and may not be suitable for phylogenetic analyses directly. In addition, a new morphometric data analysis technique coordinate-point eigenshape analysis is described and its use illustrated.

Shaping up: a geometric morphometric approach to assemblage ecomorphology

Phylogenetic structure of body shape in a diverse inland ichthyofauna

Form, function and phylogeny: comparative morphometrics of Lake Tanganyika's cichlid tribe Tropheini

Building a Body Shape Morphospace of Teleostean Fishes

Ecomorphology of Neotropical Electric Fishes: An Integrative Approach to Testing the Relationships between Form, Function, and Trophic Ecology

Form and performance: body shape and prey-capture success in four drift-feeding minnows

Combining geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis with evolutionary modeling: towards a synthesis

Repeated patterns in the body shape of distantly related estuarine and riverine cichlids from Northern Middle America

Geomorphology variables predict fish assemblages for forested and endorheic rivers of two continents

Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics: What Fish Shapes Can Tell Us about Fish Evolution

Energetic Implications of Morphological Changes between Fish Larval and Juvenile Stages Using Geometric Morphometrics of Body Shape

Ecomorphology of Longnose Gar (Lepisosteus osseus): on the influence of size, sex, and river location

Morphological responses of a stream fish to water impoundment

Geometric morphometrics and geological shape-classification systems

Phenotypic plasticity of a generalist fish species resident to lotic environments: Insights from the Great Lakes region

The Utility of Geometric Morphometrics to Elucidate Pathways of Cichlid Fish Evolution

Determination of Sexual Dimorphism and Morphological Variation of Pool Barb, Puntius sophore (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae), Using Landmark Based Geometric Morphometric Analysis

Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species?

Is shape in the eye of the beholder? Assessing landmarking error in geometric morphometric analyses on live fish

LANDMARKS, LOCALIZATION AND THE USE OF MORPHOMETRICS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

Arching effect on fish body shape in geometric morphometric studies