Association Between Social Determinants of Health, Distance from Treatment Center, and Treatment Type with Outcomes in Human Papillomavirus Associated Oropharyngeal cancer

Aisha A. Aden,Felicia O. Olawuni,Chadi N. Abdel-Halim,Agnes Q. Zhu,Travis J. Haller,Thomas J. O'Byrne,Eric J. Moore,Daniel L. Price,Kendall L. Tasche,Daniel J. Ma,Scott C. Lester,Mauricio Gamez,Michelle A. Neben-Wittich,Katharine Price,Harry E. Fuentes-Bayne,David Routman,Kathryn M. Van Abel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106675
IF: 5.972
2024-01-12
Oral Oncology
Abstract:Objectives Social determinants of health (SDOH) can influence access to cancer care, clinical trials, and oncologic outcomes. We investigated the association between SDOH, distance from treatment center, and treatment type with outcomes in human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [HPV(+)OPSCC] patients treated at a tertiary care center. Study design Retrospective review. Methods HPV(+)OPSCC patients treated surgically from 2006 to 2021 were selected from our departmental Oropharyngeal Cancer RedCap database. Demographic data, treatment, and oncologic outcomes were extracted. Distance was calculated in miles between the centroid of each patient zip code and our hospital zip code (zipdistance). Results 874 patients (89 % male; mean age: 58 years) were identified. Most patients (96 %) reported Non-Hispanic White as their primary race. 204 patients (23 %) had a high-school degree or less, 217 patients (25 %) reported some college education or a 2-year degree, 153 patients (18 %) completed a four-year college degree, and 155 patients (18 %) had post-graduate degrees. Relative to those with a high-school degree, patients with higher levels of education were more likely to live further away from our institution (p < 0.0001). Patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy elsewhere lived, on average, 104 miles further away than patients receiving radiation at our institution (Estimate 104.3, 95 % CI 14.2–194.4, p-value = 0.02). In univariable Cox PH models, oncologic outcomes did not significantly differ by zipdistance. Conclusions Education level—and access to resources—varied proportionally to a patient's distance from our center. Patients travelling further distances for surgical management of OPSCC were more likely to pursue adjuvant radiation therapy at an outside institution. Distance traveled was not associated with oncologic outcomes. Breaking down barriers to currently excluded populations may improve access to clinical trials and improve oncologic outcomes for diverse patient populations.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?