Abstract:Introduction: Despite the advancement of eye-tracking technology for smooth pursuit (SP) eye movement evaluation, qualitative observation offers much information that is not captured by computers; hence, both objective and qualitative information should be utilized to evaluate SP. This study examined the consistency among our clinicians when evaluating SP using normal (N), grossly normal (GN), mildly abnormal (MA), and abnormal (AB) as classifications. We then evaluated the effect of combining GN and MA into a single subclinical (SUBC) category. We also evaluated the computerized percent saccade (PS) metric by determining its sensitivity and specificity in classifying SP. Materials and methods: Retrospective horizontal and vertical SP test videos and numerical data for 70 participants were obtained from the Neuro Kinetics Neuro-Otologic Test Center and de-identified. From this, eye-tracking videos, time plots of eye-tracking positional data, and tables of SP eye-tracking performance data were generated for 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 Hz in both horizontal and vertical planes, totaling 6 tests per subject. Three clinicians rated each subject's SP performance as N, GN, MA, or AB for a total of 6 ratings (3 frequencies, horizontal and vertical). This process was repeated using N, SUBC, and AB as rating categories. Clinicians also provided an overall SP rating for each plane as follows: AB if the results were abnormal for 2 or more frequencies tested. Alternatively, if fewer than 2 frequencies presented with a rating of AB, then an overall rating of MA, GN, or N was determined at the respective clinician's discretion. Results: When the 3 clinicians were tasked with classifying SP videos using 4 clinical categories, fair overall agreement was demonstrated. However, when MA and GN categories were combined into an SUBC category, the overall agreement for the 3 clinicians improved slightly for both horizontal SP (HSP) and vertical SP (VSP). This pattern of agreement did not differ considerably when comparing HSP versus VSP, and good consistency and reliability was observed across clinicians. Again, inter-rater consistency was smaller for VSP versus HSP despite the reduction in clinical categories. Cut-off values were generated for the PS metric and demonstrated good specificity and sensitivity when they were exceeded for 2 or more frequencies in a particular plane when evaluating a subject's SP test.

Minimum perceptual time (MPT). Repeatability and reproducibility of variables applied to "sports vision"

Response time and response time variability as indicators of response quality during static automated perimetry

Inter and intradevice assessment of microperimetry testing in aging eyes

Normal Values for the Full Visual Field, Corrected for Age- and Reaction Time, Using Semiautomated Kinetic Testing on the Octopus 900 Perimeter

Repeatability of a Virtual Reality Headset Perimeter in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertensive Patients

Peripheral Vision Tests in Sports: Training Effects and Reliability of Peripheral Perception Test

Intra-session repeatability of quantitative metrics using widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in elderly subjects

The Repeatability and Agreement of Ocular Parameters Measured with the MYAH and Myopia Master Devices between Expert and Non-Expert Practitioners

Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the myopic traction maculopathy staging system

Intra- And Intersession Repeatability Of An Optical Quality And Intraocular Scattering Measurement System In Children

Sensitivity and Specificity of a Screening Test for the Detection of Deficiencies in Visuo-Perceptual Skills

Rapid campimetry - a novel robust kinetic approach for visual field screening in glaucoma

Assessing Lower-Extremity Visuo-Motor Reaction Time in Young Male Soccer Players: Test-Retest Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of the Brain Pro System

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Virtual Reality Perimetry in Children

Evaluation of Saccadic Component Measure on Smooth Pursuit Tests

An exploration of the agreement, inter- and intra-rater reliability, and reproducibility of three common methods used to measure minimum toe clearance with optical motion capture systems under three shoe conditions

Repeatability and reproducibility of dynamic pupillary parameters using an automated quantitative pupillometer

Static Subjective Visual Vertical in Healthy Volunteers: The Effects of Different Preset Angle Deviations and Test-Retest Variability

Number of stimuli as a reliability parameter in perimetry

Normal visual fields measured with Octopus Program G1. I. Differential light sensitivity at individual test locations

Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter