Academic foreign compound metabolism – 'quo vadis'?

S. C. Mitchell,R. H. Waring
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00498254.2024.2340740
2024-04-26
Xenobiotica
Abstract:Keywords: In the early days of academic foreign compound metabolism, the biologically-assisted chemical alteration of a compound, it was usually agreed acceptable to identify the structure of metabolites down to 5% or 2% of the given dose if possible. Anything less was regarded as beyond the limits of detection during that time, and any extraction procedures with subsequent concentration may have led to the creation of metabolic artefacts (metabonates; Beckett Citation 1971 ), a problem still encountered today (Verpoorte et al. Citation 2022 ). The compounds that were identified were usually then ranked arbitrarily into 'major' and 'minor' metabolites. Regulatory authorities have since decreed to industry, in alignment with current opinion, that drug metabolites should be identified and, in some cases, their potential toxicity investigated if they represent 10% or more of the dosed product (Gross and Wilson Citation 2009 ; Schadt et al. Citation 2018 ; Food and Drug Administration Citation 2020 ). In actuality drug metabolite identities are usually determined to below this level. Modern technology is quite able to deliver these results, with some techniques measuring down to the femtogram range or further. This is extremely useful when measuring microscopic or exceptionally dilute samples. Indeed, for known active metabolites there is no threshold value even from regulatory perspectives and in these instances as much detail as possible must be sought.
pharmacology & pharmacy,toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?