Abstract:Abstract Objective To analyse the health and environmental implications of adopting national food based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) at a national level and compared with global health and environmental targets. Design Modelling study. Setting 85 countries. Participants Population of 85 countries. Main outcome measures A graded coding method was developed and used to extract quantitative recommendations from 85 FBDGs. The health and environmental impacts of these guidelines were assessed by using a comparative risk assessment of deaths from chronic diseases and a set of country specific environmental footprints for greenhouse gas emissions, freshwater use, cropland use, and fertiliser application. For comparison, the impacts of adopting the global dietary recommendations of the World Health Organization and the EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems were also analysed. Each guideline’s health and sustainability implications were assessed by modelling its adoption at both the national level and globally, and comparing the impacts to global health and environmental targets, including the Action Agenda on Non-Communicable Diseases, the Paris Climate Agreement, the Aichi biodiversity targets related to land use, and the sustainable development goals and planetary boundaries related to freshwater use and fertiliser application. Results Adoption of national FBDGs was associated with reductions in premature mortality of 15% on average (95% uncertainty interval 13% to 16%) and mixed changes in environmental resource demand, including a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 13% on average (regional range −34% to 35%). When universally adopted globally, most of the national guidelines (83, 98%) were not compatible with at least one of the global health and environmental targets. About a third of the FBDGs (29, 34%) were incompatible with the agenda on non-communicable diseases, and most (57 to 74, 67% to 87%) were incompatible with the Paris Climate Agreement and other environmental targets. In comparison, adoption of the WHO recommendations was associated with similar health and environmental changes, whereas adoption of the EAT-Lancet recommendations was associated with 34% greater reductions in premature mortality, more than three times greater reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and general attainment of the global health and environmental targets. As an example, the FBDGs of the UK, US, and China were incompatible with the climate change, land use, freshwater, and nitrogen targets, and adopting guidelines in line with the EAT-Lancet recommendation could increase the number of avoided deaths from 78 000 (74 000 to 81 000) to 104 000 (96 000 to 112 000) in the UK, from 480 000 (445 000 to 516 000) to 585 000 (523 000 to 646 000) in the USA, and from 1 149 000 (1 095 000 to 1 204 000) to 1 802 000 (1 664 000 to 1 941 000) in China. Conclusions This analysis suggests that national guidelines could be both healthier and more sustainable. Providing clearer advice on limiting in most contexts the consumption of animal source foods, in particular beef and dairy, was found to have the greatest potential for increasing the environmental sustainability of dietary guidelines, whereas increasing the intake of whole grains, fruits and vegetables, nuts and seeds, and legumes, reducing the intake of red and processed meat, and highlighting the importance of attaining balanced energy intake and weight levels were associated with most of the additional health benefits. The health results were based on observational data and assuming a causal relation between dietary risk factors and health outcomes. The certainty of evidence for these relations is mostly graded as moderate in existing meta-analyses.

An unbiased, sustainable, evidence-informed Universal Food Guide: a timely template for national food guides

Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (2016): Comments and Comparisons

A food system transformation can enhance global health, environmental conditions and social inclusion

Connected Food: First Steps for an Ambitious National Food Strategy

The evolution process, characteristics and adjustment of Chinese dietary guidelines: A global perspective

International evidence for the effectiveness of the front-of-package nutrition label called Nutri-Score

Generating the evidence for risk reduction: a contribution to the future of food-based dietary guidelines

Comparison of dietary guidelines among 96 countries worldwide

Adherence to the Eatwell Guide and population and planetary health: A Rank Prize Forum report

Inequalities in Research on Food Environment Policies: An Evidence Map of Global Evidence from 2010-2020

Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations

Development of uniform food information -the case of front of package nutrition labels in the EU

The healthiness and sustainability of national and global food based dietary guidelines: modelling study

Perspective: Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in Europe—Scientific Concepts, Current Status, and Perspectives

A novel food processing-based nutrition classification scheme for guiding policy actions applied to the Australian food supply

Sustainable food systems—a health perspective

Environmentally Sustainable Food Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda From a Goal-Directed Perspective

Sustainable food systems under environmental footprints: The delicate balance from farm to table

A Global Analysis of National Dietary Guidelines on Plant-Based Diets and Substitutions for Animal-Based Foods

Principles of Sustainable Healthy Diets in Worldwide Dietary Guidelines: Efforts So Far and Future Perspectives

Toward public health nutrition strategies in the European Union to implement food based dietary guidelines and to enhance healthier lifestyles