Abstract:Background While coronary stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can mechanically revascularize culprit epicardial vessels, it might also cause distal embolization. The relationship between geometrical and functional results of stent expansion during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is unclear. Objective We sought to determine the optimal stent expansion strategy in pPCI using novel angiography-based approaches including angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (QFR)/microcirculatory resistance (MR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods Post-hoc analysis was performed in patients with acute STEMI and high thrombus burden from our prior multicenter, prospective cohort study (ChiCTR1800019923). Patients aged 18 years or older with STEMI were eligible. IVUS imaging, QFR, and MR were performed during pPCI, while stent expansion was quantified on IVUS images. The patients were divided into three subgroups depending on the degree of stent expansion as follows: overexpansion (>100%), optimal expansion (80%−100%), and underexpansion (<80%). The patients were followed up for 12 months after PCI. The primary endpoint included sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unexpected hospitalization or unplanned revascularization, and all-cause death. Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled. The average stent expansion degree was 82% (in all patients), 117% (in overexpansion group), 88% (in optimal expansion), and 75% (in under-expansion). QFR, MR, and flow speed increased in all groups after stenting. The overall stent expansion did not affect the final QFR ( p = 0.08) or MR ( p = 0.09), but it reduced the final flow speed (−0.14 cm/s per 1%, p = 0.02). Under- and overexpansion did not affect final QFR ( p = 0.17), MR ( p = 0.16), and flow speed ( p = 0.10). Multivariable Cox analysis showed that stent expansion was not the risk factor for MACE (hazard ratio, HR = 0.97, p = 0.13); however, stent expansion reduced the risk of MACE (HR = 0.95, p = 0.03) after excluding overexpansion patients. Overexpansion was an independent risk factor for no-reflow (HR = 1.27, p = 0.02) and MACE (HR = 1.45, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis shows that mild underexpansion of 70%−80% was not a risk factor for MACE (HR = 1.11, p = 0.08) and no-reflow (HR = 1.4, p = 0.08); however, stent expansion <70% increased the risk of MACE (HR = 1.36, p = 0.04). Conclusions Stent expansion does not affect final QFR and MR, but it reduces flow speed in STEMI. Appropriate stent underexpansion of 70–80% does not seem to be associated with short-term prognosis, so it may be tolerable as noninferior compared with optimal expansion. Meanwhile, overexpansion and underexpansion of <70% should be avoided due to the independent risk of MACEs and no-reflow events.

Prevalence and anatomical factors associated with stent under‐expansion in non‐severely calcified lesions

Novel Predictors of Stent Under‐expansion Regarding Calcified Coronary Lesions Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography

In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors of Coronary Artery Aneurysms after Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Chronic Total Occlusions

Definition of Optimal Optical Coherence Tomography–Based Stent Expansion Criteria: In-Stent Minimum Lumen Area Versus Residual Stent Underexpansion

A Novel Optical Coherence Tomography‑based Calcium Scoring System Can Predict the Stent Expansion of Moderate and Severe Calcified Lesions

Different treatment modalities for underexpanded stents—Effectiveness and outcomes: A practical guide

Over-expansion of second-generation drug-eluting stents, risk of restenosis, and relation to major adverse cardiac events

Target Lesion Revascularization After Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Microvascular and Prognostic Effect in Lesions With Different Stent Expansion During Primary PCI for STEMI: Insights From Coronary Physiology and Intravascular Ultrasound

Prediction of stent under-expansion in calcified coronary arteries using machine learning on intravascular optical coherence tomography images

Mechanism of Stent Failure in Patients with Eruptive Calcified Nodule Treated with Rotational Atherectomy

Underexpansion of Wallstents® in the Treatment of Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions

Optimal Minimal Stent Area and Impact of Stent Underexpansion in Left Main Up-Front 2-Stent Strategy

Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Optimal Stent Expansion on 3-Year Hard Clinical Outcomes

Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria for Defining the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: an International Multicenter Study.

Impact of Nodular Calcification in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

Implications of calcified nodule and adjacent calcification severity for target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention: multi-center intravascular ultrasound imaging study

Non-target lesion progression: Unveiling critical predictors and outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis

Impact of lesion morphology on stent elongation during bifurcation PCI: an in vivo OCT study

Stent Expansion Indexes to Predict Clinical Outcomes: An IVUS Substudy From ADAPT-DES