Abstract:The deleterious effects of anesthetic agents in patients suffering from coronary artery disease are well known. The risk increases when a patient has compromised ventricular function. There is a paucity of literature regarding the choice of the suitable agent to avoid deleterious effects in such patients. The use of etomidate and propofol has been considered superior to other intravenous anesthetic agents in these groups of patients. The aim of the present study is to compare the hemodynamic effects of anesthesia induction with etomidate, thiopentone, propofol, and midazolam in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. This randomized clinical trail was conducted at the All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Sixty patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 45%) scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery participated in this study. After stabilization baseline hemodynamic data stroke volume variation and systemic vascular resistance index were recorded for all patients (Flo Trac TM sensor with Vigileo cardiac output monitor used for hemodynamic monitoring). The patients were randomly alloted to one of the four groups and the intravenous induction agent was administered for over 60-90 seconds (Group E--Etomidate 0.2 mg/Kg; Group M--Midazolam 0.15 mg/Kg; Group T--Thiopentone 5 mg/Kg; Group P--Propofol 1.5 mg/Kg). Hemodynamic data were recorded at one minute intervals starting from induction till seven minutes after intubation,--the end point of the present study. There was a significant decrease in the heart rate in comparison to the baseline(-7 to -15%, P = 0.001), mean arterial pressure (-27 to -32%, P = 0.001), cardiac index (-36 to -38%, P = 0.001), and stroke volume index (-27 to -34%, P = 0.001) after induction in all four groups. The hemodynamic response was similar in all the four groups. There was no significant change in central venous pressure and stroke volume variation (SVV) during induction and intubation, while the effects on the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were variable. The midazolam group was the most effective in preventing intubation stress (tachycardia,hypertension). The change from baseline values in heart rate (+ 4%, P = 0.12) and mean arterial pressure (-1%, P = 0.77) after intubation were not statistically significant in the midazolam group. The etomidate group was the least effective of all the four groups in minimizing stress response, with statistically significant increase from baseline in both heart rate (P = 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (P = 0.001) at 1 minute after intubation. All the four anesthetic agents were acceptable for induction in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction despite a 30-40% decrease in the cardiac index. Clinician experience along with knowledge of the potential interactions (e.g., premedication, concurrent opioid use) is needed to determine hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in these patients with ventricular dysfunction.

QT interval of the ECG, heart rate and arterial pressure during anaesthetic induction: comparative effects of alfentanil and esmolol

Effect of Remimazolam Tosilate Versus Etomidate on Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Influences of Different Doses of Esmolol on Intubation Response

Effects of Esmolol on the Bispectral Index During Orotracheal Intubation

Effects of different doses of alfentanil on cardiovascular response to rapid sequence intubation in elderly patients: a parallel-controlled randomized trial

Effects of esmolol on bispectral index during anesthesia induction with propofol

Comparison of the effects of propofol and alfaxalone on the electrocardiogram of dogs, with particular reference to QT interval

EFFECTS OF ESMOLOL ON THE PREVENTION OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO TRACHEAL INTUBATION

Effect of intravenous esmolol on BIS index and anesthesia emergence during sedation anesthesia for ambulatory surgery]

Effect of intravenous esmolol on BIS index and anesthesia emergence during sedation anesthesia for amnbulatory surgery

Alfentanil versus fentanyl for emergency department rapid sequence induction with ketamine: A-FAKT, a pilot randomized trial

Variation of hemodynamic response following induction and tracheal intubation: etomidate vs midazolam

Prolongation of the QT-interval during induction of anesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease

[Mechanism of the Preventing of Endotracheal Intubation Response with Esmolol-the Relationship Between the Plasma Catecholamine Level and Bispectral Index].

[Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease]

Remimazolam vs Etomidate: Haemodynamic Effects in Hypertensive Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery

Effects of intravenous and inhalational anesthetics on short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials]

A randomized trial of anesthetic induction agents in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction

Administration of esmolol during operation decreased the consumption of fentanyl in senile patients and its safety

A Comparative Study between the Efficacy of Different Agents Used to Attenuate the Heamodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Elderly Controlled Hypertensive Patients

The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation During Sufentanil-Based Induction of Anaesthesia