Cost-effectiveness of expanded latent TB infection testing and treatment: Lynn City, Massachusetts, USA

G.R. Beeler Asay,R. Woodruff,D.M. Sanderson,C.F. Fisher,S.M. Marks,V.D. Green,A.M. Tibbs,A.N. Hill,H.H. Haptu,D. McManus,R.K. Paradise,C. Auguste-Nelson,J.J. Cochran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.22.0654
2024-01-01
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Between October 2016 and March 2019, Lynn Community Health Center in Massachusetts implemented a targeted latent TB infection testing and treatment (TTT) program, increasing testing from a baseline of 1,200 patients tested to an average of 3,531 patients tested, or 9% of the population per year. METHODS: We compared pre-implementation TTT, represented by the first two quarters of implementation data, to TTT, represented by 12 quarters of data. Time, diagnostic, and laboratory resources were estimated using micro-costing. Other cost and testing data were obtained from the electronic health record, pharmaceutical claims, and published reimbursement rates. A Markov cohort model estimated future health outcomes and cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective in 2020 US dollars. Monte Carlo simulation generated 95% uncertainty intervals. RESULTS: The TTT program exhibited extended dominance over baseline pre-intervention testing and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$52,603 (US$22,008â–“US$95,360). When compared to baseline pre-TTT testing, the TTT program averted an estimated additional 7.12 TB cases, 3.49 hospitalizations, and 0.16 deaths per lifetime cohort each year. CONCLUSIONS: TTT was more cost-effective than baseline pre-implementation testing. Lynn Community Health Centerâ–TMs experience can help inform other clinics considering expanding latent TB infection testing.
infectious diseases,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?