Abstract:Introduction There is an expanding role for anesthesiologists in the preoperative optimization and postoperative management of patients, often in the context of a so-called perioperative surgical home. Such efforts typically include enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and often an anesthesiologist-led team for perioperative management. Studies of the cost-effectiveness of such approaches have generally been conducted at single institutions, with most patients cared for by small numbers of surgeons. This limitation creates generalizability issues as to whether improvement was related mostly to organizational culture or the studied surgeons' practices (non-generalizable) versus the procedures (generalizable). We studied whether other organizations can rely on achieving similar benefits following the adoption of a studied process improvement strategy at a single institution. Methods All patients undergoing elective major therapeutic inpatient surgery discharged between October 2015 and June 2022 at non-federal hospitals in the state of Florida were included. For each discharge, the United States Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weighting factor (i.e., the multiplier for the hospital's base rate for admissions that determines reimbursement) and the Clinical Classification Software Refined (CCSR) code for the principal procedure were determined at admission and discharge from the state's inpatient healthcare database based on the diagnoses present at those time points. An increase in the weighting factor from admission to discharge represents societal costs from perioperative complications. Statewide, by hospital, and by surgeon, we calculated the total increase for each CCSR's weighting factor. Our primary hypothesis was that surgeon variability would be statistically greater than CCSR variability but that the incremental effect would be <5%. If CCSR and surgeon variability were comparable, this would be supportive of generalizability. In contrast, if there were a predominant effect related to the surgeon, results from one institution might not be applicable to others. Results Among the 1,482,344 discharges studied, the pooled (N=7 years) contributions to MS-DRG weighting factor increases from the upper 20% of surgeons were 2.8% more than from the upper 20% of CCSRs (95% CI 1.9%-3.9%, p=0.0006). Those CCSRs accounted for 85.5% (95% CI 79.4%-91.7%, p<0.0001) of the total increase in the MS-DRG weighting factor. The average contribution of the top two surgeons at each hospital to that hospital's increase in the weighting factor ranged among CCSRs from 68% to 97%. The median and 75th percentile of surgeons performing at least 10% of the total number of cases at each hospital was similar to those values for the contributions to the increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor, median 2.0 to 3.0, and 75th percentile 1.75 to 4.0. Conclusions Because variability among surgeons in their contributions to increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor only slightly exceeded the variability among CCSR surgical categories, perioperative surgical home and ERAS study research results involving single institutions and a small number of surgeons would likely be generalizable to other hospitals and healthcare systems. Funding agencies should not be hesitant to fund single-center perioperative surgical home studies and ERAS interventions based on concerns related to lack of generalizability.

Robotic availability, not payor status, determines access to robotic emergency general surgery hernia repair in California and Florida

Trends and Disparities in Robotic Surgery Utilization for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

National trends and outcomes of robotic emergency general surgery in the United States

Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery

Comparisons of abdominal wall reconstruction for ventral hernia repairs, open versus robotic

National analysis of cost disparities in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic abdominal operations

Gender Differences in the Adoption and Utilization of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (RALS) Among Practicing Urologists: A Study of American Board of Urology Case Logs from 2012-2022

Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Incremental Societal Costs of Perioperative Complications Following Adult Elective Inpatient Major Therapeutic Surgery in the State of Florida: A Seven-Year Retrospective Epidemiological Analysis

Ventral hernia repair with permanent mesh for non-Hispanic black versus white patients: access and post-operative outcomes in the era of robotic surgery

Cost comparison between medicare and private insurance for robotic transhiatal esophagectomy

The Influence of Medical Insurance on Patient Access to Orthopaedic Surgery Sports Medicine Appointments Under the Affordable Care Act

A cost-conscious establishment of a robotic abdominal wall reconstruction program in a publicly funded healthcare system

Robotic approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair may be associated with improved wound morbidity in high-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

Initial experience with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and early discharge protocols after robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia surgery

Analyzing the influence of expanding multispecialty adoption of robotic surgery on robotic urologic care

Retrospective cost analysis of robotic and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis

An MBSAQIP Analysis of 318,151 Patients

Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures

Payer Status and Racial Disparities in Time to Surgery for Emergent Orthopaedic Procedures