Abstract:BackgroundImproper acetabular component orientation in THA has been associated with increased dislocation rates, component impingement, bearing surface wear, and a greater likelihood of revision. Therefore, any reasonable steps to improve acetabular component orientation should be considered and explored.Questions/purposesWe therefore sought to compare THA with a robotic-assisted posterior approach with manual alignment techniques through a posterior approach, using a matched-pair controlled study design, to assess whether the use of the robot made it more likely for the acetabular cup to be positioned in the safe zones described by Lewinnek et al. and Callanan et al.MethodsBetween September 2008 and September 2012, 160 THAs were performed by the senior surgeon. Sixty-two patients (38.8%) underwent THA using a conventional posterior approach, 69 (43.1%) underwent robotic-assisted THA using the posterior approach, and 29 (18.1%) underwent radiographic-guided anterior-approach THAs. From September 2008 to June 2011, all patients were offered anterior or posterior approaches regardless of BMI and anatomy. Since introduction of the robot in June 2011, all THAs were performed using the robotic technique through the posterior approach, unless a patient specifically requested otherwise. The radiographic cup positioning of the robotic-assisted THAs was compared with a matched-pair control group of conventional THAs performed by the same surgeon through the same posterior approach. The safe zone (inclination, 30°–50°; anteversion, 5°–25°) described by Lewinnek et al. and the modified safe zone (inclination, 30°–45°; anteversion, 5°–25°) of Callanan et al. were used for cup placement assessment. Matching criteria were gender, age ± 5 years, and (BMI) ± 7 units. After exclusions, a total of 50 THAs were included in each group. Strong interobserver and intraobserver correlations were found for all radiographic measurements (r > 0.82; p < 0.001).ResultsOne hundred percent (50/50) of the robotic-assisted THAs were within the safe zone described by Lewinnek et al. compared with 80% (40/50) of the conventional THAs (p = 0.001). Ninety-two percent (46/50) of robotic-assisted THAs were within the modified safe zone described by Callanan et al. compared with 62% (31/50) of conventional THAs p (p = 0.001). The odds ratios for an implanted cup out of the safe zones of Lewinnek et al. and Callanan et al. were zero and 0.142, respectively (95% CI, 0.044, 0.457).ConclusionsUse of the robot allowed for improvement in placement of the cup in both safe zones, an important parameter that plays a significant role in long-term success of THA. However, whether the radiographic improvements we observed will translate into clinical benefits for patients—such as reductions in component impingement, acetabular wear, and prosthetic dislocations, or in terms of improved longevity—remains unproven.Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Placement of Standard Sized Acetabular Cup Between True and False Acetabulum in Patients with Crowe III/IV Dysplasia: A Safe Option in THA Without Femoral Osteotomy

Posterosuperior Placement of a Standard-Sized Cup at the True Acetabulum in Acetabular Reconstruction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip With High Dislocation.

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Crowe III/IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Acetabular Morphology and Reconstruction Techniques

Combined Anteversion Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

The Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Severe Dysplasia (Crowe III and IV) Provides Satisfactory Medium to Long-Term Outcomes

[Total Hip Arthroplasty with Uncemented Cup and Femoral Head Autografts for Coxarthrosis Due to Dysplasia].

[Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip with S-ROM Prosthesis].

[Total hip arthroplasty with supracondylar shortening osteotomy in Crowe 4 inveterate hip dislocation: case report and surgical technique]

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cementless Cups and Femoral Head Autografts for Patients with Hip Dysplasia and Osteoarthritis

The press-fit technique without screws and bone graft can be used as an alternative method in Crowe type II and III hip dysplasia

Current Concepts and Technologies in Acetabular Cup Positioning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

[Biomechanical research progress of common acetabular reconstruction techniques for Crowe type Ⅱ and Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip]

[Hip joint biomechanical analysis of the acetabular anatomical reconstruction and nonanatomical reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip by finite element method]

Acetabular Configuration and Its Impact on Cup Coverage of A Subtype of Crowe Type 4 Ddh with Bi-Pseudoacetabulum

Comparison of Robotic-assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Placement in THA: A Matched-pair Controlled Study

Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type IV Hip Dysplasia: Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Complications

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement during anterolateral supine total hip arthroplasty using intraoperative fluoroscopy: a retrospective study

[Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type-Iv Development Dysplasia of Hip in Adults].

A novel intraoperative acetabular reaming center locating method in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip: a retrospective cohort study

Integrated Acetabular Prosthesis Versus Bone Grafting in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type II and III Hip Dysplasia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study